You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 38 Next »

Co-Chairs Proposed Procedures for URS Policy and Operational Recommendations-28 August 2018.pdf

    I. Suggested Operational Fix
    Order No. Proponent Topic Deferred to Phase 2? File Tentative Presentation Date
    1 Kristine Dorrain

    B. NOTICE

    3. Other topics

    URS-Proposal-1.pdf

     
    2 Maxim Alzoba

    F. REMEDIES

    2. Duration of Suspension Period

    3. Review of Implementation

    URS-Proposal-2.pdf

     
    3 Zak Muscovitch

    F. REMEDIES

    2. Duration of Suspension Period

    3. Review of Implementation

    URS-Proposal-3.pdf

     
    4 George Kirikos

    F. REMEDIES

    4. Other topics

    URS-Proposal-4.pdf

     

    II. Draft Policy Recommendation 

    Order No.

    		 Proponent Topic (Mapped to the Super Consolidated URS Topics Table) Deferred to Phase 2? File Tentative Presentation Date
    5 George Kirikos

    A. THE COMPLAINT

    3. Limited filing period

    		 Yes

    URS-Proposal-5.pdf
    6 Claudio DiGangi

    A. THE COMPLAINT

    8. Other topics

    URS-Proposal-6.pdf

     
    7 George Kirikos

    B. NOTICE

    1. Receipt by registrant (Notice - feedback from Complainant & Respondent)

    		 Yes

    URS-Proposal-7.pdf
    8 George Kirikos

    C. RESPONSE

    1. Duration of response period

    		 Yes

    URS-Proposal-8.pdf
    9 David McAuley

    C. RESPONSE (primary topic)

    1. Duration of response period

    ==

    G. APPEAL (secondary topic)

    2. De novo review

    URS-Proposal-9.pdf

     
    10 Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

    C. RESPONSE (primary topic)

    1. Duration of response period

    ==

    G. APPEAL (secondary topic)

    2. De novo review

    URS-Proposal-10.pdf

     
    11 Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

    C. RESPONSE

    3. Response fee

    URS-Proposal-11.pdf

     
    12 George Kirikos

    D. STANDARD OF PROOF

    1. General

    		 Yes

    URS-Proposal-12.pdf
    13 Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

    F. REMEDIES

    1. Scope of remedies

    URS-Proposal-13.pdf

     
    14 Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

    F. REMEDIES

    1. Scope of remedies

    URS-Proposal-14.pdf

     
    15 Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

    F. REMEDIES

    1. Scope of remedies

    URS-Proposal-15.pdf

     
    16 Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

    F. REMEDIES

    1. Scope of remedies

    2. Duration of suspension period

    URS-Proposal-16.pdf

     
    17 Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

    F. REMEDIES

    2. Duration of suspension period

    URS-Proposal-17.pdf

     
    18 George Kirikos

    G. APPEAL

    1. Appeals process

    		 Yes

    URS-Proposal-18.pdf
    19 George Kirikos

    G. APPEAL

    1. Appeals process

    		 Yes

    URS-Proposal-19.pdf


    20 George Kirikos

    G. APPEAL

    1. Appeals process

    		 Yes

    URS-Proposal-20.pdf
    21 Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

    I. COST

    1. Cost allocation model

    URS-Proposal-21.pdf

     
    22 Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

    I. COST

    1. Cost allocation model

    URS-Proposal-22.pdf

     
    23 George Kirikos

    I. COST

    1. Cost allocation model

    		 Yes

    URS-Proposal-23.pdf
    24 George Kirikos

    J. LANGUAGE ISSUES

    1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination

    URS-Proposal-24.pdf

     
    25 Zak Muscovitch

    J. LANGUAGE ISSUES

    1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination

    URS-Proposal-25.pdf

     
    26 Zak Muscovitch

    M. URS PROVIERS

    1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists)

    URS-Proposal-26.pdf

     
    27 Zak Muscovitch

    M. URS PROVIERS

    1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists)

    URS-Proposal-27.pdf

     
    28 Zak Muscovitch

    M. URS PROVIERS

    2. Conflict of interest

    URS-Proposal-28.pdf

     
    29 George Kirikos

    M. URS PROVIDERS

    (no applicable subheading at present)

    		 Yes

    URS-Proposal-29.pdf


    30 George Kirikos

    N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES

    1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g. summary procedure in the UDRP

    		 Yes

    URS-Proposal-30.pdf
    31 David McAuley

    (no applicable subheading at present)

    URS-Proposal-31.pdf

     

    III. Other 
    Order No. Proponent Topic Deferred to Phase 2?
    		 File Tentative Presentation Date
    32 George Kirikos

    N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES

    1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g., summary procedure in the UDRP


    URS-Proposal-32.pdf

     
    33 George Kirikos (no applicable subheading at present) Yes

    URS-Proposal-33.pdf



    Click the files below to quickly download URS Proposals. You may click "Download All" at the bottom to mass download all URS Proposals.

      File Modified
    No files shared here yet.



    • No labels