You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 21 Next »

(blue star)Objective

Consistent with ICANN’s mission and Bylaws, Section 4.6(e)(ii), the review team will assess the effectiveness of today’s WHOIS (the now current gTLD RDS, including cumulative changes made to the then-current RDS which was assessed by the prior RT) by (a) inventorying changes made to WHOIS policies and procedures since the prior RT completed its work, (b) using that inventory to identify significant new areas of today’s WHOIS (if any) which the team believes should be reviewed, and (c) determining if any specific measurable steps should be recommended to enhance effectiveness in those new areas.

(blue star) Leader/Rapporteur: Stephanie Perrin

(blue star)Members: Alan Greenberg, Stephanie Perrin, Susan Kawaguchi

(blue star)Mailing-list archives:  http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-anythingnew/

(blue star)Conference calls

(blue star)Review Team Templates: see here


Subgroup Documents

Date

Document (Versions in Red are latest)

File


09 Feb 2018

17 Jan 2018

06 Dec 2017

First Pass Document

v3

v2

v1


DOCX

DOCX

DOCX

Background Documents

Further background documents may be found on the Review Team's overall Background Materials page.

Open Actions/Requests

*To be provided once reasonable date is determined by appropriate subject-matter expert

Item #Source of RequestDate of RequestAction Item RequestAction Owner

Anticipated Completion Date*

Progress Notes
3#22

 

Consider need to review procedure for handling conflict, and to assess the need to review each of the identified items in depth.

Subgroup members

2#22

 

Assess which policy/procedures will be addressed and which ressources will be needed to do so.

Subgroup members

Completed Actions/Requests

*To be provided once reasonable date is determined by appropriate subject-matter expert

Item #Source of RequestDate of RequestAction Item RequestAction Owner

Anticipated Completion Date*

Progress NotesCompleted ResponseCompletion Date
1#1

 

ICANN Org to circulate a list of policies in a format that enables subgroup members to identify their "top 5" new/updated policies to examine and briefly why. Subgroup members to reply to subgroup mailing list no later than next Thursday. The subgroup will then reconvene to discuss priorities and determine next steps.

ICANN org

See email sent to subgroup.

 

Decisions Reached

SourceDateDecision
#1

 

Subgroup to prioritize polices and procedures identified in the provided inventory, and then use results to answer for top priority items:

  • Has subteam identified needed briefings/resources?
  • How will subgroup review/analyze materials?
  • How will you conduct investigation?
  • How will you conduct relevant interviews?
  • How will your subgroup produce is summary of key findings?

This prioritization will not remove other items from consideration, but rather help the subgroup begin work on top-priority items.

  • No labels