You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 11 Current »

Comment Close
Date
Statement
Name 

Status

Assignee(s)

Call for
Comments Open
Call for
Comments
Close 
Vote OpenVote CloseDate of SubmissionStaff Contact and EmailStatement Number
 Initial Report on Data & Metrics for Policy MakingADOPTED 13Y, 0N, 0AMaureen Hilyard    23:59 UTC Steve Chan steve.chan@icann.orgAL-ALAC-ST-0915-02-00-EN

For information about this Public Comment, please click here 

 

FINAL VERSION TO BE SUBMITTED IF RATIFIED

Please download the PDF document below. 

Error rendering macro 'viewpdf'

com.atlassian.confluence.macro.MacroExecutionException: com.atlassian.confluence.macro.MacroExecutionException: The viewfile macro is unable to locate the attachment "AL-ALAC-ST-0915-02-00-EN.pdf" on this page




FINAL DRAFT VERSION TO BE VOTED UPON BY THE ALAC

ALAC Statement on the Initial Report on Data & Metrics for Policy Making

The ALAC welcomes the opportunity to provide community input into the Initial Report from the GNSO's Working Group with regards to possible recommendations for the use of Data and Metrics for Policy Making.

The ALAC appreciates the need for solutions that will improve the way in which consensus policies are developed, especially in relation to critical registrant, registry and registrar issues. It is desirable that these issues are addressed within an open and transparent working culture as well as an environment where data is collected in a confidential and anonymous manner. Subsequently, this will encourage better-informed, fact-based policy development and decision-making.

It is important that all parties involved in GNSO decision-making recognise the benefit and value of relevant baseline data and metrics to the Policy Development Process, especially at the initial stages of scoping, understanding and describing a problem or issue. In order to ensure engagement of all parties in the new process, the ALAC supports the possible need to employ an independent third party in order to address any concerns relating to the collection, anonymization and aggregation of data. Fact-based deliberations and decision-making will enable the appropriate prioritization of critical issues based on tangible evidence rather than "gut feeling" or anecdotal examples.

The ALAC supports the introduction of a "pilot" where working groups will be able to submit proposals or ideas whereby the collection and assessment of fact-based data and metrics can become the basis for the initial identification and analysis of issues and/or problems. We also support the view that any funding required to implement the pilot should be considered an investment in the improvement of the policy process rather than a cost against budget.

The ALAC supports the revision of the templates for the Issue Report, Charter and Final Report to update earlier WG guidelines and also the development of a decision tree. These changes will help determine the best avenue to request additional data and metrics. The development of a Policy Development Process Manual, which will include the "Metrics Request Tree and Form", will ensure consistency of both process and practice.

Establishing a framework for distributing information through early outreach to other SOs, ACs and related organisations will facilitate broader qualitative input and support a culture of collaboration between our organisations. This will not only contribute to continuous improvement being fully integrated into the Policy Development Process but also encourage the potential of an Open Data culture across ICANN.

 


FIRST DRAFT SUBMITTED

The ALAC welcomes being given the opportunity to provide community input into the Initial Report from the GNSO's Working Group with regards to possible recommendations for the use of Data and Metrics for Policy Making.

The ALAC appreciates the need for solutions that will improve the way in which consensus policies are developed, especially in relation to critical registrant, registry and registrar issues. It is desirable that these are addressed within a working culture that is open and transparent; collects data in an environment that ensures confidentiality and anonymity; and subsequently encourages better informed, fact-based policy development and decision-making.

All parties involved in GNSO decision-making must recognise the benefit and value of relevant baseline data and metrics to the policy development process, especially at the initial stages of scoping, understanding and describing a problem or issue. Because of the importance of engaging all parties into the new process,the ALAC supports the possible need to employ an independent third party in order to address any concerns relating to the collection, anonymization and aggregation of data.  Fact-based deliberations and decision-making will enable critical issues to now be prioritised appropriately based on tangible evidence rather than "gut feeling" or anecdotal examples.

The ALAC supports the introduction of a "pilot"  where working groups will be able to submit proposals or ideas whereby the impact of fact-based data and metrics collection can become the basis for the initial identification and analysis of issues and/or problems.  We also support the view that any funding required to implement the pilot should be considered an investment in the improvement of the policy process rather than a cost against budget.

The ALAC supports the revision of the templates for the Issue Report, Charter and Final Report to update earlier WG guidelines and also the development of a decision tree to help to determine the best avenue to request additional data and metrics. The development of a Policy Development Process Manual, which will include the "Metrics Request Tree and Form", will ensure consistency of both process and practice.

Establishing a framework for distributing information through early outreach to other SOs and ACs  and other related organisations, will facilitate broader qualitative input as well as support a culture of collaboration between our organisations. This will not only contribute to continuous improvement being fully integrated into the policy development process but also encourages the potential of an Open Data culture across ICANN.

  • No labels