| Comment Close Date | Statement Name | Status | Assignee(s) | Call for Comments Open | Call for Comments Close | Vote Open | Vote Close | Date of Submission | Staff Contact and Email | Statement Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | Response to the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA Stewardship Transition from the Cross Community Working Group on Naming Related Functions (CWG-Stewardship) | ADOPTED 15Y, 0N, 0Abstain | Alan Greenberg | 25.06.2015 | 25.06.2015 | ALAC & Regional Leadership Wrap-Up Session 1 - Buenos Aires - 2015.06.25 | ALAC & Regional Leadership Wrap-Up Session 1 - Buenos Aires - 2015.06.25 | 25.06.2015 | Grace Abuhamad grace.abuhamad@icann.org | n/a |
FINAL VERSION TO BE SUBMITTED IF RATIFIED
ALAC Motion to adopt the Final Transition Proposal of the Cross Community Working Group on Naming-Related Functions (CWG-Stewardship)
Error rendering macro 'viewpdf'
com.atlassian.confluence.macro.MacroExecutionException: com.atlassian.confluence.macro.MacroExecutionException: The viewfile macro is unable to locate the attachment "ALAC-CWG-IANA-Motion-25June2015-Final.pdf" on this page
FINAL DRAFT VERSION TO BE VOTED UPON BY THE ALAC
ALAC Motion to adopt the Final Transition Proposal of the Cross Community Working Group on Naming-Related Functions (CWG-Stewardship)
Whereas;
1. The ALAC co-chartered the Cross Community Working Group to develop an IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal on Naming Related Functions (CWG-Stewardship);
2. The ALAC, with the support of its Members and Participants on the CWG-Stewardship as well as other interested parties, has duly considered the CWG Stewardship Final Proposal dated 11 June 2015;
3. The Final Proposal is significantly dependent and expressly conditioned on the implementation of ICANN-level accountability mechanisms by the Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability). If any element of these ICANN level accountability mechanisms is not implemented as contemplated by the CWG-Stewardship proposal, this CWG-Stewardship proposal will require revision and re-approval by the ALAC
Resolved;
1. The ALAC approves the CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal and its submission to the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group.
2. The ALAC wishes to record the following comments:
a. The selection of the two PTI Board members by the Nominating Committee or similar mechanism should attempt to address geographic diversity without sacrificing competence.
b. The success of PTI will be contingent on ICANN ensuring adequate operational and R&D funding as well as other resources.
3. The ALAC reaffirms its commitment to continue to support the CWG-Stewardship in any and all follow-on activities related to the submission of this report.
The ALAC wishes to express its sincere appreciation of the diligent and productive work performed by the CWG-Stewardship, its Co-Chairs, its Members and Participants.
FIRST DRAFT SUBMITTED
Motion to adopt the Final Transition Proposal of the Cross Community Working Group on Naming-Related Functions (CWG-Stewardship)
Whereas;
- The ALAC co-chartered the Cross Community Working Group to develop an IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal on Naming Related Functions (CWG-Stewardship);
- The ALAC, with the support of its Members and Participants on the CWG-Stewardship as well as other interested parties, has duly considered the CWG Stewardship Final Proposal dated 11 June 2015;
- The Final Proposal is significantly dependent and expressly conditioned on the implementation of ICANN-level accountability mechanisms by the Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability). If any element of these ICANN level accountability mechanisms is not implemented as contemplated by the CWG-Stewardship proposal, this CWG-Stewardship proposal will require revision and re-approval by the ALAC
Resolved;
- The ALAC approves the CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal and its submission to the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group.
- The ALAC wishes to record the following comments:
- The selection of the two PTI Board members by the Nominating Committee or similar mechanism should attempt to address geographic diversity without sacrificing competence.
- The success of PTI will be contingent on ICANN ensuring adequate operational and R&D funding as well as other resources.
- [The ALAC believes that there is no need to include a CSC liaison in the composition of the IANA Function Review Team.]
- [The ALAC believes that no member of an IANA Function Review Team shall be allowed to be a member of a Separation Cross Community Working Group created as a result of the Review Team’s recommendation.]
- The ALAC reaffirms its commitment to continue to support the CWG-Stewardship in any and all follow-on activities related to the submission of this report.
- The ALAC welcomes and will consider invitation to the ALAC to participate in the following proposed post-transition IANA structures:
- IANA Functions Review Team;
- Customer Standing Committee;
- Separation Process Working Group.
- The ALAC wishes to express its sincere appreciation of the diligent and productive work performed by the CWG-Stewardship, its Co-Chairs, its Members and Participants.
