You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

 

ATRT2 Templates

[These templates are a tool to organize thinking and provide basis for informed debate in Los Angeles.  The templates are not intended to be a report format.]

 

A.        Analysis of previous review teams recommendations

 

[Section A. should be completed for each recommendation made by the prior review teams.  It is intended to document assessment of ATRT 2 of ICANN’s implementation of prior recommendations.]

 

-       Recommendation

 

-       Summary of ICANN’s assessment of implementation including actions taken, implementability and effectiveness

The ATRT 2 inquired as to how the benchmarking was done and whether it was published, specific to the benchmarking portion of this recommendation.

Relative to benchmarking Board/BGC skillsets, the Board Skill and Training Benchmarking Analysis was published in October 2012 (http://www.icann.org/en/news/in-focus/accountability/board-benchmarking-analysis-14oct12-en.pdf).  Grant Thornton’s National Board Governance Survey for Not-for-Profit Organizations is cited in this analysis and was one of the key sources used for benchmarking.   The information generated from the surveys and materials reviewed in the benchmarking analysis were received from 465 CEOs, CFOs, board members and other officials of higher education institutions, trade and professional associations, social and human service organizations, cultural organizations, health care organizations and foundations.  

Much has been done to inform the community about NomCom and contribute to transparency - web site improvements as well as presentations and other communications to keep people informed.  Additional and innovative outreach/PR efforts focused on finding candidates would be useful.  Staff is already considering the following tactics - integrating messaging about recruitment effort into all presentations, coordinating with GSE regional leaders and expanding social media activities.

-       Summary of community input on implementation, including effectiveness

 

-       Summary of other relevant information

 

-       ATRT2 analysis of recommendation implementation (e.g. complete, incomplete or ongoing)

DRAFT Observation

1 (a) - Document the methodology used to identify and choose “similar corporate and other governance structures”. 

1 (b) -  Document benchmarks used. 

1 (c) -  Improve NomCom outreach/PR.

1 (d) - Expand the skills survey and benchmarking to include NomCom selections in GNSO, ccNSO, and ALAC.

[Complete – recommendation has been implemented and all work has been completed. 

Successful/Unsuccessful

Incomplete – recommendation has not been implemented or has been implemented partially;  no further work is being conducted.

In Progress – the work has not been completed and is ongoing.]

-       ATRT2 assessment of recommendation effectiveness  [Includes rationale for the recommendation.]

B.        Proposed new recommendations

 

-       Hypothesis of problem

 

-       Background research undertaken

 

  • Summary of ICANN input

 

  • Summary of community input

  • Summary of other relevant research

 

-       Relevant ICANN bylaws/published policies/published procedures

 

-       ATRT2 analysis & rationale

 

-       Draft recommendation

 

-       Public Comment on Draft Recommendations (to be completed later)

 

-       Final recommendation (to be completed later)

 

Note: Links to relevant documents can be included, provided the link refers to a specific section of a given document.  Alternatively,  relevant section of other documents may be copies and pasted.

  • No labels