Page History
...
Topic | Entry Date (E) ____________ Target Date (T) | Action Item | Responsible Council Member ____ Responsible Staff member |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GNSO Chair election 2018
|
|
| Nathalie Peregrine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SSAC Brief on Board Request Re Use of Emoji in Domain Names
| 27 Jun |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Next steps following adoption of ICANN Board Temporary Specification
| 12 Jun |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-Term and Long-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline for Specific Reviews
| (T) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PDP 3.0
| Green
| COMPLETED | 24 May
|
|
| send the updated Charter to the Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies and Nominating Committee (NomCom) appointees on the GNSO Council and remind SG/Cs/NomCom appointees that they should reconfirm their SSC representatives within three weeks following the 2018 Annual General Meeting.
| Incoming PDP co-chair | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SubPro/RPM Consolidated timeline
| Green
| COMPLETED | 24 May
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marika Konings | Exiting PDP Chairs
|
|
| CSC and IFR Review |
| 15 Mar
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CSC Charter Review |
|
| 15 Mar
| Board request regarding emojis
|
|
| ICANN62 Meeting Planning
|
|
| CSC and IFR Review
|
| Donna Austin and Philippe Fouquart to lead small team to suggest ways to avoid overlap between reviews; coordinate with the ccNSO in doing so.CSC Charter Review
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated Charter for the Cross Community Engagement Group on Internet Governance
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Drafting Team on charter related to the next steps for the ICANN Procedure of Handling Whois conflicts with Privacy
|
|
| Review of the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP)
|
| Updated Charter for the Cross Community Engagement Group on Internet Governance
|
|
|
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
- GNSO Council, after having considered the 1 August letter from Akram Atallah and receiving a brief update from GDD on its 24 August Council meeting, should determine next steps for reviewing the Whois Procedure.
- Drafting team members to share draft charter and identified questions in charter with respective SG/Cs for feedback, following which the drafting team will review this input and finalize the charter for GNSO Council consideration.
- Council to consider adoption of charter at its upcoming meeting
- ICANN Staff to circulate a call for volunteers (subsequent to the initiation and chartering process for the EPDP on the Temporary Specification) to the GNSO Stakeholder Groups, with the request for each Stakeholder Group to appoint up to 3 members to the Implementation Advisory Group (IAG). The call for volunteers should also be more widely circulated to seek volunteers to serve as participants and observers to the IAG. To be discussed at August 2018 Council meeting.
- ICANN staff to adjust the existing action item on the ICANN Procedure of Handling Whois conflicts with Privacy topic to reflect that the call for volunteers should occur subsequent to the initiation and chartering process for the EPDP on the Temporary Specification. To be discussed at August 2018 Council meeting.
GNSO members for the ICANN Accountability and Transparency (ATRT3) Review Team
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
- GNSO Secretariat
- GNSO Secretariat to inform the endorsed candidates that the GNSO Council expects that if selected for the ATRT3, the applicant will represent the views of the entire GNSO community in their work on the ATRT3, and provide regular feedback as a group on the discussions taking place in the ATRT3, as well as the positions being taken by GNSO Review Team members. (to be completed after meeting with other SO/ACs to determine final Review Team membership)
- to communicate resolved #1 (“The GNSO Council nominates, ranked in order: Brian Cute (RySG), Wolfgang Kleinwächter (NCSG), Stéphane Van Gelder (RySG) as its primary three candidates for the ATRT3. Furthermore, the GNSO nominates, in ranked order: Tatiana Tropina (NCSG), Michael Karanicolas (NCSG), Adetola Sogbesan (BC), Erica Varlese (RySG) to be considered for inclusion in the ATRT3 by the SO-AC Chairs should additional places be available that need to be filled.”) to the staff supporting the ATRT3.
- GNSO Secretariat to inform the endorsed candidates that the GNSO Council expects that if selected for the ATRT3, the applicant will represent the views of the entire GNSO community in their work on the ATRT3, and provide regular feedback as a group on the discussions taking place in the ATRT3, as well as the positions being taken by GNSO Review Team members. (to be completed after meeting with other SO/ACs to determine final Review Team membership
CCWG-Accountability WS2
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Council to familiarize themselves with recommendations in preparation for consideration of Final Report.
- Council members to encourage their respective groups to provide input to the currently open public comment forum (close date of 11 May 2018) to identify potential inconsistencies in the recommendations (see https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-2018-03-30-en).
- )
- Staff supporting the ATRT3 and application process to send a response to those applicants who did not receive endorsement for this Review Team, thanking them for their interest and note their importance in the event an alternate is needed in the future. The response should encourage them to follow the ATRT3 work, participate in Public Comments and community discussions, and to apply for future opportunities within the GNSO Community as they arise. (to be completed after meeting with other SO/ACs to determine final Review Team membership)
- ICANN Staff to post GNSO Council Leadership letter to GNSO nominated ATRT3 members on the GNSO Correspondence page.
Heather Forrest Rafik Dammak Donna Austin
Marika KoningsIGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Susan Kawaguchi to collaborate with the PDP WG and staff to develop a draft final report for preliminary consideration by the GNSO Council (targeting May meeting).
- Susan Kawaguchi and Heather Forrest to prepare report on the usage of the 3.7 Appeal Process contained in the GNSO Operating Procedure that is intended to capture the process used and lessons learned.
- ICANN staff to inform the IGO-INGO CRP PDP WG that the GNSO Council resolved that the Working Group, in line with the Council’s priority to ensure responsible allocation of resources and timely management of the PDP, the Final Report be submitted in time to meet the July 2018 GNSO Council meeting document deadline.
ICANN Board Temporary Policy Proposal
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Council to develop next steps in preparation for possible adoption of temporary policy by the ICANN Board which would kick off a one year PDP.
- Heather Forrest to follow up with Cherine Chalaby to see if there is any new information from the Board.
- ICANN Staff to create Google Doc to capture input from Councilors and their respective SG/Cs about what should be discussed in meeting with the ICANN Board.
- By 1 June, Councilors to seek input from their respective SG/Cs to determine what they believe should be discussed in meeting the with the ICANN Board, and enter the information in the Google Doc created.
- ICANN Staff to schedule meeting with the Board to take place shortly after 1 June.
- ICANN Staff to create doodle poll to schedule extraordinary meeting on or around 14 June.
- RDS PDP Leadership to prepare post mortem on what took place in the PDP to be completed by end of July so that it can be shared with the Council in conjunction with the reminder on PDP3.0. Receipt of the post mortem will mark the closure of the RDS PDP.
Consensus Policy Implementation Framework
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Councilors to review proposed amendments to the Consensus Policy Implementation Framework (CPIF) and if desired, disseminate to their respective Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies. The goal is to ensure feedback is returned to ICANN org in a timely manner and allow for them to provide a proposed final version by the end of July.
- Councilors to review Post Implementation Consensus Policy Review Framework (PICPRF) process diagram and complete survey by 18 May (see https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/postimplreview).
Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
...