Page History
...
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA
3.1. overview of the responses received
3.2. CCWG assessment | What topics or issues - if any - require further discussion/consideration before a determination can be made on the preferred mechanism?
o Shall we recommend an advisory board (SO/AC/Board/ICANN ORG members) in case of potential conflicts? ( - Nominet and EIB for example - ) o Is there a need to define 'supervision' from ICANN Org further? o One-off fund or long-term fund? · Do we want to define the sunsetting period? 4. Next steps in making a determination of what is the preferred mechanism:
5. Confirm next steps & next meeting – Thursday 3 May 2018 at 14.00 UTC BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS |
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Transcript |
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: John Levine, Kavouss Arasteh |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items Notes & Action Items – new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Meeting – Thursday 26 April 2018
These high-level notes are designed to help the CCWG navigate through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the transcript and/or recording. The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided separately and are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/DLHDAw.
3.1. overview of the responses received wiki space: https://community.icann.org/x/BSW8B[community.icann.org]
3.2. CCWG assessment | What topics or issues - if any - require further discussion/consideration before a determination can be made on the preferred mechanism?
o Shall we recommend an advisory board (SO/AC/Board/ICANN ORG members) in case of potential conflicts? ( - Nominet and EIB for example - ) o Is there a need to define 'supervision' from ICANN Org further? o One-off fund or long-term fund? · Do we want to define the sunsetting period?
Action item #1: Samantha Eisner to check whether there is anything that is unique to ICANN and as such would affect liability for ICANN Org / Board and report back accordingly, if possible ahead of the launch of the survey.
Action item #2: Staff to work with co-chairs to develop proposed straw poll survey which is to be shared with the CCWG for review and input prior to launch. Action item #3: Following circulation of straw poll survey, CCWG to review and provide input as soon as possible.
|