Page History
Session Information: https://icann60abudhabi2017.sched.com/event/CbKA/gnso-registries-stakeholder-group-rysg-membership-meeting
Date: 31 October 2017
Time: 04:30 - 04:55 UTC (time converter)
Recordings:
Transcript: EN
Slides: SSR2 Outreach Slides - v2 for editing.ppt.pdfOctober 2017
Notes:
- What is the background to the Board letter and next steps?
- It’s something that should go to the community. There seems to be alot of emphasis on inaccurate WHOIS information/registrar compliance...things I’d expect to be part of the WHOIS review team. I have some concerns of going into those areas because I don’t know why we’d look at that from an SSR standpoint. I think more of infrastructure within ICANN/IANA. DNS Abuse I can make a case for being under SSR. I don’t believe that WHOIS abuse is equivalent for DNS abuse. There was a data request that focused on WHOIS inaccuracies and all the data behind that. Maybe because that letter focused alot on it I thought it was a big emphasis.
- Board letter notes in correspondence that it has scope concerns. I want to note that the scope is outlined in the Bylaws. I don’t think the team is colouring outside the lines. I’d like more context around the suggestion that SSR2 is outside its scope.
- We as the community have new responsibilities after IANA transition. SO/ACs are responsible for appointing nominees to the RT.
- Why did you ask for information on all information security of ICANN org. that was not related to iana functions.
