Versions Compared

Old Version 4

changes.mady.by.user de saint gery

Saved on

compared with

New Version 5

changes.mady.by.user de saint gery

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

 Made by: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben

Seconded by: Amr Elsadr

Whereas,

 

  1. The GNSO Review Working Party was formed to serve as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent examiner and the ICANN Board’s Organizational Effectiveness Committee.
  2. Each GNSO Stakeholder Group and Constituency appointed representatives to serve on the Working Party.
  3. The GNSO Review Working Party provided input on the review criteria, 360 assessment and served as a conduit for input from GNSO Stakeholder Groups, Constituencies as well as the GNSO Council.
  4. The GNSO Review Working Party offered guidance to the independent examiner to ensure the draft report accurately reflects the GNSO structure, scope and dynamics.
  5. The Final Report of the independent examiner was published on 15 September 2015 (see https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gnso-review-final-15sep15-en.pdf) and contained 36 recommendations in the areas of: participation & representation, continuous development, transparency and alignment with ICANN’s future.
  6. The GNSO Review Working Party reviewed the recommendations and conducted a feasibility and prioritization analysis (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/review-feasibility-prioritization-25feb16-en.pdf), which it submitted to the GNSO Council on 28 February 2016. 
  7. The GNSO Council reviewed the feasibility and prioritization analysis provided by the GNSO Review Working Party.

...