Page History
Action Item / Request | Entry Date | Target Date | Responsible Council Member (if applicable) | Responsible Staff member (if applicable) | Additional Notes | Status |
Appoint GNSO Council liaison to IRTP D WG | 17/01 | 10 April |
| Marika Konings | Request | Completed Volker Greimann has volunteered to serve as the Council Liaison for volunteers sent to the mailing list (28/1) and repeated on GNSO Council Call in February as well as March. Volunteers encouraged to come forward. |
Policy vs Implementation | 17/01 | ongoing | All | Marika Konings | Continue discussions on the mailing list and consider potential next steps | Staff Discussion Paper was published for public comment (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/policy-implementation-31jan13-en.htm). A session will be organized in Beijing for which all SO/ACs as well as GNSO SG have been invited to designate a representative. If not done so yet, GNSO SG are encouraged to confirm their participation. GNSO Council to continue deliberations on its role in this discussionSession was held in Beijing. Council to consider possible next steps at its meeting in Beijing. |
Beijing Meeting Planning:
| 14/3 | 5 April | All | Glen de Saint-Gery | GNSO volunteers to date for small working group to prepare ccNSO-GNSO meeting: GNSO Volunteers: Petter Rindforth, Joy Liddicoat, Ching Chiao, Maria Farrell, Wendy SeltzerCompleted
| |
| Request update on TMCH/RPMs as well as closed Generic TLDs | 14/3 | 5 April | Marika Konings | Update requested, awaiting feedback | Completed - updates have been provided during Beijing meeting. | |
| Inform the Meeting Strategy Working Group of action taken at Council meeting with regard to list of GNSO candidates | 14/3 | 14/3 | Glen de Saint Gery | Completed | ||
| Form Proxy and Privacy Services exploratory group | 14/3 | 5 April | Jeff Neuman | Marika Konings | There seemed to be interest from some members of Council to start discussions on the provision of proxy/privacy services. This could include discussions of under what circumstances is it appropriate to relay information sent to the proxy/privacy service provider and when is it appropriate to relay information? Should there be an accreditation process for these providers? Should there be a special agreement governing those services, etc. It was proposed to get this discussion started so that the group can help frame a possible request for an issue report to get a pdp started. | Request for volunteers sent to Council mailing list by Jeff. |
