Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Monday 25 February 2013 at 2100 UTC

 

Action Items

 

5 persons RG members agreed to have the statements sent to the RALOs for review.    

If the RG releases statements, it has to be available to respond any questions. 

Each RALO has to look at each EACH of the 5 new gTLD applications and their corresponding objection statements and say if they support or not the statements for each application, whether the RALO supports the corresponding objection statement being filed by the ALAC.

There are 2 options for the RALO only:

 

Do you support statement: YES/NO

 

If at the end of next week of when the 5 RALOs have responded and 2 have support, the ALAC will only have to look at those 2 applications that had RALO supportYES/NO to each objection statement, and more than 3 RALOs have expressed support for filing the objection statement, then the ALAC has to conside such advice by the RALOs. Objection statements against applications NOT supported by 3 or more RALOs will no longer be considered.

 

Idea: Staff to organize a call  on Thursday, 28 Feb with RALO Leaders for a Q& A session with RALO leaders so that they are briefed on the course of action, expected answers from RALOs. Doodle should include one or two choices between 19:00-21:00 UTC (for one global call) or two calls for Western/Eastern hemispheres.

...