Page History
...
Topic | Entry Date (E) ____________ Target Date (T) | Action Item | Responsible Council Member ____ Responsible Staff member | Additional Notes | ||||||||||||||||||||||
GNSO Prioritization
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
PDP3.0 Final Report |
| PDP 3.0 Small Group
|
|
| Confirmation of volunteers for Council liaisons to PDP/IRTs
|
|
k drazek Pam Little Rafik Dammak Proposed amendments to CPIF
| |||||||||||||||||||
Managing IDN Variants TLDs
| 22 Aug
|
| Regarding the JIG format, the small team is not ready to look at that yet. but it's on their radar. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Legislative Tracker
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Status | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
colour | Blue | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
title | IN PROGRESS - ON HOLD |
|
| Evolution of the Multi stakeholder Model of Governance
|
|
| Evolution of the Multi stakeholder Model of Governance |
| 10 Mar
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
EPDP 2 team request for input on data accuracy | Managing IDN Variants TLDs
| Blue
| IN PROGRESS |
|
| Regarding the JIG format, the small team is not ready to look at that yet. but it's on their radar. | IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms
| Staff preparing final draft for Heather and Susan's sign-off. | IFR team
| |||||||||||||||||
New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Project Change Request
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs PDP Project Change Request
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANN67
|
|
| k drazek | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Draft FY21-25 Operating & Financial Plan and Draft FY21 Operating Plan & Budget
|
|
|
2020 Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
SPS Segment | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The role and responsibilities of the GNSO Council as a member of the Empowered Community
|
|
| ||||||||
PDP3.0 Improvements
|
|
|
| ||
SPS Survey |
- IANA Function Review (IFR) Team composition: Review of the ccNSO proposal to manage deficiencies - Councilors to take discussion on ccNSO proposal (here: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2019-January/022175.html) to their respective SG/C and to then consider what input they would like to provide.
|
|
|
|
- Councilors to work to complete the letter, which may include integrating elements such as: When the letter references that some Councilors having dissenting views, that the group holding those dissenting views are identified. Add clarity about the ask of the ICANN Board (e.g., confirm that the Board and Council have a common understanding).
- Rafik Dammak to confirm when recommendation one, purpose 2 will be expected to be discussed by the EPDP phase 2
k drazek Pam Little Rafik Dammak
Marika Konings Nathalie Peregrine
RPM Charter amendments
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
TO BE MOVED TO PROJECT LIST
- Staff to circulate call for volunteers to draft Charter amendments for Phase 2 of Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs, following completion of Council action on Charter Addendum concerning referral of IGO-INGO Curative Rights PDP Recommendation 5.
- Add project placeholder to GNSO Council Council List
k drazek Pam Little Rafik Dammak
Mary Wong Julie Hedlund Ariel Liang
Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Policy Status Report
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Council to further consider next steps in relation to the review of the Transfer Policy (which could include the chartering of a narrowly focused EPDP) which would result in providing GDD information/response on expected next steps and/or seek additional information as the Council considers how to approach the Transfer Policy review, for example, holistically instead of piecemeal. The Council anticipates receiving input from the Registrars Stakeholder Group on the Review of the Transfer Policy as well as the request for the suspension of the contractual compliance enforcement of the FOA.
- Rubens Kuhl, as Council liaison, to reach out to the IRT for the EPDP Phase 1 to have a conversation and gain a better understanding of how to address recommendation 24 and the Form of Authorization issue stemming from the Temporary Specification. Marked completed as it has been confirmed that the EPDP Phase 1 will not address the FOA issue beyond the changes that have been recommended by the EPDP Phase 1.
- Council to convene a small focused drafting team (e.g., like the IDN Scoping Team) to review several items, including at least the review of the ICANN Policy Status Report, considering the possibility of policy development mechanisms, and the form of authorization (FOA) issues.
- ICANN Staff to circulate call for volunteers to form small drafting team.
k drazek Pam Little Rafik DammakRubens Kuhl
Marika Konings Steve Chan Caitlin Tubergen
Invitation to provide feedback on the ICANN Board's Proposed Public Interest Framework
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Council to convene a small drafting team to formulate a response to the public comment period.
- ICANN Staff to circulate call for volunteers to form small drafting team.
k drazek
Pam Little
Rafik Dammak
EPDP Phase 2 Work plan package
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Councilors to review EPDP Phase 2 work plan package and share any comments or questions with the mailing list
k drazek Pam Little Rafik Dammak
Marika Konings Steve Chan Berry Cobb
Draft Amendments to the review of the Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in all gTLDS Charter to integrate Rec 5 From IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanism Final Report
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Small team to address Councilors' feedback (e.g., language about new recommendations superseding recommendations 1-4, ensuring technical expertise is available and team composition) and deliver a revised draft by 27 September for Council review. After Council review, send draft to GAC/IGOs for their review prior to Council vote.
k drazek
Pam Little
Rafik Dammak
Marika Konings Mary Wong Julie Hedlund Ariel Liang
Draft response to questions on the Independent Review Process Oversight Team (IRP-IOT)
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Councilors to provide input by 30 September 2019. Small team to address Councilors feedback, if applicable, and complete revised draft for sending to ICANN org.
k drazek
Pam Little
Rafik Dammak
CCT-RT Recommendations Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Councilors to review and send comments, if applicable, by 26 September.
- Council leadership to subsequently draft cover letter and send response to the ICANN Board, shortly thereafter.
Pam Little
Rafik Dammak
Potential dependencies between the NCAP and New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Council leadership to send letter to the ICANN Board.
k drazek
Pam Little
Rafik Dammak
Verisign request to defer enforcement of the Thick WHOIS transition policy
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Council leadership to send letter to ICANN Board.
Marika Konings Nathalie Peregrine
Request for Clarification on Data Accuracy and Phase-2 of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Council leadership to draft response to ICANN org, acknowledging receipt of the letter, acknowledgment of the underlying issue, and committing to determine next steps as a Council.
- ICANN staff to include an agenda item on the September Council meeting, inviting ICANN Org to speak on the impact of GDPR as well as the EPDP 1 recommendations on the enforcement and implementation of existing policies, procedures, and contractual provisions related to accuracy (including ARS).
- Council to convene a small group to draft a substantive response on data accuracy for Council review to send to ICANN Org in response to 21 June letter (https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/marby-to-drazek-21jun19-en.pdf) (volunteers: Marie, Darcy, Flip)
Rafik Dammak k drazek Pam Little
PDP3.0 updates
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Councilors to review and provide feedback on the finalized implementation elements (1, 2, 3, 6) by 13 September 2019 at the latest.
- ICANN Staff to send slides and remind Councilors of the deadline for input.
k drazek Pam Little Rafik Dammak
Marika Konings Steve Chan Berry Cobb
IRP IOT Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Council to convene small team to review questions posed by ICANN org. (Volunteers: Flip Petillion as lead, Elsa Saade)
- Small team to provide proposed Council response to questions to GNSO Council
ATRT3 Survey
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Councilors to draft response to ATRT3 Survey (volunteers: none)
k drazek Pam Little Rafik Dammak
2018 Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
...
- Council to consider whether existing mechanisms provide for sufficient opportunity to conduct “emergency” consultations to allow for GNSO Chair to gather input on certain topics and/or decisions that need to be taken.
- Council members to provide leadership team with feedback on leadership team’s performance & actions on a regular basis.
- Current Council Chair (Heather Forrest) to provide report at the end of her term outlining main challenges / concerns / recommendations in fulfilling the role.
- Council to consider whether Council leadership should have a contract / letter of appointment that would outline role, responsibilities and expectations.
...
Changes to GNSO Operating Procedures and related governance documents to facilitate participation in Empowered Community
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
...
- Council leadership to reach out to SG/C leadership to notify them of the changes made to the GNSO Operating Procedures and the requirements for SG/Cs to develop supporting procedures and processes.
- Staff to work on first draft of templates for motions related to EC powers as highlighted in the staff report (see https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-revisionsgnso-op-procedures-bylaws-staff-report-16may17-en.pdf).
...
|
2019 Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
SPS Segment | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Role and responsibilities of GNSO more broadly |
| |||
How to manage Council’s 2019 workload: strategies to increase effectiveness |
| |||
Wrap up and close of session |
|
2018 Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
...
What does Council need/want to achieve in 2018, and how to do this?
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
...
- Donna Austin to share comments on scheduling of cross-community discussions with the GNSO Council.
- Staff to keep project timing planning document up to date and share it with the Council prior to every ICANN meeting to facilitate review and oversight of timelines. Explore whether there is a more dynamic way in which the document can be publicly shared.
- Council leadership to reach out to leadership of Curative Rights and Reconvened WG on RCRC to see whether it is feasible to deliver Final Reports within 6-month timeframe.
- Council leadership to notify ICANN Board with regards to PDPs that are expected to deliver to finalize their report shortly so that concerns or issues can be raised prior to GNSO Council consideration.
- Council leadership to request update from GNSO-appointed members to RDS Review Team at upcoming GNSO Council meeting.
- Council to explore mechanisms and tools for monitoring / reviewing costs related to PDP WGs with a view to improving efficiency and effectiveness
- Council members to review framework for post-implementation reviews and provide input. Council leadership to add this to an upcoming Council meeting agenda to continue this discussion. Council to consider forming a small group of volunteers to work with staff on further developing the framework.
2019 Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
Other
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Council leadership team to send “thank you” note to Becky Burr for her presentation and James Bladel for his facilitation assistance.
- Council to seek to map out timing elements for utilizing the nine powers held by the EC. Consider if and how an emergency community consultation mechanism can be integrated. (Note: the GNSO Bylaws Drafting Team is in the midst of addressing this item. Target for delivery date is post-ICANN65)
- Council to go through examples/scenarios to see how the EC powers can be utilized. This should include going down into the SG/C level of detail. (see DT Timeline and Background Documents)
- For the section 3.6 Speaking at Meetings of the GNSO Operating Procedures, Council to consider revising this section since it is not strictly enforced.
- Council leadership and staff to consider documenting the internal operating procedures of the leadership team. Create a Chair/Vice-chair handbook, to help understand role and responsibilities.
- Council leadership to make the Council meeting planning document public, to both help Councilors stay informed about upcoming topics, but to seek their input for meeting preparation.
- Staff to investigate if the GNSO can serve as a Slack guinea pig in the already existing pilot effort within ICANN org. The use of Slack would be incumbent on a review of this platform first to understand how its threads would be archived and what level of access ICANN org would have to privileged or private communications between members. The GNSO Council will discuss whether document drafting can take place in Slack, but because the Council highly values transparency and accountability, the Council agreed that documents would need to be circulated on the archived email list to ensure that they are properly incorporated into the public record.
- Council leadership to liaise with the Nominating Committee to understand from Appointees and Panelists, what works, what does not within the process, and better understand how the selection process takes place. Councilors to investigate how NCAs can be better informed; identify what communications they might not be receiving.
PDP 3.0 - General Discussion on three Improvements (#2, #5, & #13)
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Staff to prepare a comparison table for the proposed Working Group models, which could include several factors: membership eligibility, operating procedures, decision-making, communicating decision-making, urgency/timing (e.g., prioritization). Consider creating pros/cons as well.
PDP 3.0 - Sub-group presentation and wrap-up
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Small group of Councilors to continue work of the sub-groups to make specific PDP 3.0 implementation recommendations. Council to agree to working methods. (Action Item taken on board by the PDP 3.0 small team)
Role and responsibilities of Council Liaisons
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Council to consider whether Consensus Policy Implementation Framework (CPIF) needs to be reevaluated as it relates to guidance for Council liaisons to IRTs, avoiding relitigation of policy issues, and escalation of issues (noting that the Policy & Implementation recommendations adopted in 2015 state that the recommendations, including the CPIF, should be evaluated after at most 5 years). (Action Item taken on board by the PDP 3.0 small team)
- Council to consider options for enhancing the WG participation model, including terms for participation that members must agree to. (Action Item taken on board by the PDP 3.0 small team)
- Erika Mann to send note to Council upon the adoption of the new copyright law and the potential impact on GNSO policy work / DNS.
- Council to form a small team to work on the definitions in the Project Timing Document in relation to definitions of priority and level of effort.
- Staff to update Project Timing Document to try and incorporate suggestions from Councilors.
- As part of PDP 3.0, Council to establish PDPs Chair(s)/ liaisons communication / reporting timelines and requirements to Council.
- Council to consider adding request for website upgrade to the Council comment to the FY20 budget.
- Council to consider how to better understand the specific resourcing needs of PDP WGs (e.g., SCBO to meet with PDP leadership in August of every year).
Lunch with the Board
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Council leadership to follow up on status of RPMs litigation threats.
- Council leadership to get Council input on the Board initiatives for discussion in Kobe.
- Staff to identify what are low-hanging fruit in the PDP 3.0 implementation plan. Prioritize/color-code. Identify dependencies (e.g., reporting is needed prior to evaluation).
- Recurring: Small team of Councilors / Council leadership to report progress of PDP 3.0 at each Council meeting. Establish project plan for implementation for PDP 3.0. (Action Item taken on board by the PDP 3.0 small team)
- In order to better prioritize work, need to know capacity of Council, community, staff, Staff to get existing information from Berry Cobb about average commitment and Council to see if that can be utilized, leveraged, and/or updated.
- Reviewed prior version from 2017 and must be refreshed to be useful
- Staff to check if ICANN legal has looked into the insurance for WG members question.
SPS Segment | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Role and responsibilities of Council leadership |
|
Other Council Related Action Items
...