Page History
...
Topic | Entry Date (E) ____________ Target Date (T) | Action Item | Responsible Council Member ____ Responsible Staff member | Info | Additional Notes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GNSO Prioritization
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PDP3.0 Final Report | ICANN staff, WG leadership to collaborate with NCSG members to help them better understand legal basis and rationale for protections. EPDP Update | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Status | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
colour | Blue | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
title | COMPLETED |
|
| Rafik Dammak | GNSO2 Review |
|
| Julie Hedlund | GNSO Review of ICANN62 GAC Communique |
|
| Nathalie Peregrine | IFR team
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Geo Regions Review |
|
| Managing IDN Variants TLDs |
|
| Next steps following adoption of ICANN Board Temporary Specification
|
|
| Regarding the JIG format, the small team is not ready to look at that yet. but it's on their radar. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Evolution of the Multi stakeholder Model of Governance |
|
|
|
| consolidate input and comments into a Google document.SubPro/RPM Consolidated timeline
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Status | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
colour | Blue | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
title | IN PROGRESS |
|
| Updated Charter for the Cross Community Engagement Group on Internet Governance
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
EPDP 2 team request for input on data accuracy
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Project Change Request
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs PDP Project Change Request
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANN67
|
|
| k drazek | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Draft FY21-25 Operating & Financial Plan and Draft FY21 Operating Plan & Budget
|
|
|
2020 Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
SPS Segment | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The role and responsibilities of the GNSO Council as a member of the Empowered Community
|
|
|
- Drafting team members to share draft charter and identified questions in charter with respective SG/Cs for feedback, following which the drafting team will review this input and finalize the charter for GNSO Council consideration.
- Council to consider adoption of charter at its upcoming meeting
- Call for volunteers to be delayed at least until the EPDP hits the milestone of publishing its Initial Report. Council to discuss this topic once that milestone is hit.
- ICANN Staff to circulate a call for volunteers (subsequent to the initiation and chartering process for the EPDP on the Temporary Specification) to the GNSO Stakeholder Groups, with the request for each Stakeholder Group to appoint up to 3 members to the Implementation Advisory Group (IAG). The call for volunteers should also be more widely circulated to seek volunteers to serve as participants and observers to the IAG.
| ||
PDP3.0 Improvements |
Michele Neylon Paul McGrady k drazek Stephanie Perrin Pam Little
Marika Konings Nathalie Peregrine
GNSO members for the ICANN Accountability and Transparency (ATRT3) Review Team
|
|
| ||
SPS Survey |
- GNSO Secretariat to inform the endorsed candidates that the GNSO Council expects that if selected for the ATRT3, the applicant will represent the views of the entire GNSO community in their work on the ATRT3, and provide regular feedback as a group on the discussions taking place in the ATRT3, as well as the positions being taken by GNSO Review Team members. (to be completed after meeting with other SO/ACs to determine final Review Team membership)
- Staff supporting the ATRT3 and application process to send a response to those applicants who did not receive endorsement for this Review Team, thanking them for their interest and note their importance in the event an alternate is needed in the future. The response should encourage them to follow the ATRT3 work, participate in Public Comments and community discussions, and to apply for future opportunities within the GNSO Community as they arise. (to be completed after meeting with other SO/ACs to determine final Review Team membership)
- ICANN Staff to post GNSO Council Leadership letter to GNSO nominated ATRT3 members on the GNSO Correspondence page.
- Standing Selection Committee to check with selected candidates and determine if they are still interested in serving on the ATRT3.
- ICANN staff to ask MSSI what the expected timeline to begin work is, once the short/long-term review public comment periods conclude. Inquire as well if they are intending to run an additional call for volunteers.
|
|
- ICANN staff to inform the IGO-INGO CRP PDP WG that the GNSO Council resolved that the Working Group, in line with the Council’s priority to ensure responsible allocation of resources and timely management of the PDP, the Final Report be submitted in time to meet the July 2018 GNSO Council meeting document deadline.
- Councilors to review Final Report, especially in the broader context of the appropriate overall scope of protection for all IGO identifiers, in preparation for consideration as early as the August Council meeting.
- ICANN staff to inform the ICANN Board and the GAC that the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Mechanisms PDP Working Group has completed its work and forward a copy of the Final Report to them
- Councilors to review Final Report and options flowchart, then prepare a list of questions by 31 August 2018 that they have, for response by the WG leadership, WG liaison, WG members, or staff as appropriate.
- ICANN staff to work with the GNSO Chair and Council liaison to determine possible ways to address concerns regarding some of the PDP recommendations within the scope of the PDP Manual, in light of the fact that the WG has not identified any recommendations as being interdependent.
Consensus Policy Implementation Framework
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Councilors to review proposed amendments to the Consensus Policy Implementation Framework (CPIF) and if desired, disseminate to their respective Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies. The goal is to ensure feedback is returned to ICANN org in a timely manner and allow for them to provide a proposed final version by the end of July.
- Councilors to review Post Implementation Consensus Policy Review Framework (PICPRF) process diagram and complete survey by 18 May (see https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/postimplreview).
- ICANN staff to provide Consensus Policy Implementation Framework (CPIF) updates and related slides to the Council list.
- Council to determine by 31 July 2018 whether the proposed updates are acceptable or determine if something further is needed (e.g., webinar)
...
|
2019 Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
SPS Segment | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Role and responsibilities of GNSO more broadly |
| |||
How to manage Council’s 2019 workload: strategies to increase effectiveness |
| |||
Wrap up and close of session |
|
2018
...
Strategic Planning Session (SPS) Action Items
SPS Segment | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes |
---|
- Council leadership to consider adding references to relevant ICANN Bylaw sections for agenda items on the GNSO Council agenda, following the example of the ICANN Board.
- Council to discuss with the ICANN Board on Day 3 what can be done to facilitate understanding and communication between the GNSO Council and the ICANN Board – may require more than 1 hour at every ICANN meeting.
Role and responsibilities of Council leadership |
|
- Staff to update liaison document based on input provided and circulate it to the Council for further review and discussion.
- Council to reconfirm liaisons to PDP WG, IRTs and other projects once agreement has been achieved on the role and responsibilities of liaisons.
- Council leadership to reach out to SG/C leadership to notify them of the changes made to the GNSO Operating Procedures and the requirements for SG/Cs to develop supporting procedures and processes.
- Staff to work on first draft of templates for motions related to EC powers as highlighted in the staff report (see https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-revisionsgnso-op-procedures-bylaws-staff-report-16may17-en.pdf).
- Council leadership to develop clear timeline for action items listed hereunder as well as who will be responsible for delivering on these.
- Engage with PDP leadership teams at ICANN61 during GNSO weekend sessions to discuss state of work, identify challenges and possible paths forward. Council leadership team to review ICANN61 schedule and carve out time for this discussion.
- Develop a white paper on incremental changes to the PDP that outlines these discussions as well as main findings of staff discussion paper to engage the broader community in this conversation.
- Donna Austin to share comments on scheduling of cross-community discussions with the GNSO Council.
- Staff to keep project timing planning document up to date and share it with the Council prior to every ICANN meeting to facilitate review and oversight of timelines. Explore whether there is a more dynamic way in which the document can be publicly shared.
- Council leadership to reach out to leadership of Curative Rights and Reconvened WG on RCRC to see whether it is feasible to deliver Final Reports within 6-month timeframe.
- Council leadership to notify ICANN Board with regards to PDPs that are expected to deliver to finalize their report shortly so that concerns or issues can be raised prior to GNSO Council consideration.
- Council leadership to request update from GNSO-appointed members to RDS Review Team at upcoming GNSO Council meeting.
- Council to explore mechanisms and tools for monitoring / reviewing costs related to PDP WGs with a view to improving efficiency and effectiveness
- Council members to review framework for post-implementation reviews and provide input. Council leadership to add this to an upcoming Council meeting agenda to continue this discussion. Council to consider forming a small group of volunteers to work with staff on further developing the framework.
...
...
Other Council Related Action Items
Topic | Entry Date | Action Item | Responsible Party | Additional Notes | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nominating Committee (NomCom) Review Implementation Planning Team (IPT).
|
|
| Steve Chan | CSC and IFR Review |
|