Page History
The call will take place on Wednesday, 20 October 2021 at 13:00 UTC for 60 minutes.
For other places see: https://tinyurl.com/6x2uefhf
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA
i. Initial thoughts on improvements and enhancements that can be introduced ii. Should a more periodic survey be introduced, and if so, what impact does this have on the existing ‘end of life’ survey? iii. Should an assessment of the performance of WG leadership be part of the WG Self-Assessment? If yes, how can a chilling effect be avoided? iv. If WG leadership should become part of the WG Self-Assessment, is the draft survey that was developed as part of PDP 3.0 deliberations (see https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/pdp-3-13-wg-member-survey-leadership-performance-10feb20-en.pdf [gnso.icann.org]) a helpful starting point? c. Discuss next steps & approach 4. Confirm action items & next meeting BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS CCOICI - Survey Early Input - WG Self-Assessment - 12 Oct 2021.pdf |
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: Kristian Ørmen, Desiree Miloshevic Evans |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items Action Items:
Notes: Proposed Agenda – CCOICI Meeting on Wednesday 20 October at 13.00 UTC
2. Status update on SOI Task Force Assignment (see https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2021-October/025038.html)
3. CCOICI Assignment #3: Working Group Self-Assessment a. Review assignment Background:
b. Review initial input received on survey questions:
Question #2: Initial thoughts on improvements and enhancements that can be introduced
Discussion:
Questions #3, #4, #5 and #6: Should a more periodic survey be introduced, and if so, what impact does this have on the existing ‘end of life’ survey? and etc.
Question #7 and #8: If you responded that there should be a periodic survey, should the Working Group Self-Assessment at the end of a WG's lifecycle remain in place? And etc.
Questions #9 and #10: Should an assessment of the performance of WG leadership be part of the WG Self-Assessment? If yes, how can a chilling effect be avoided? And etc.
Question #11: If WG leadership should become part of the WG Self-Assessment, is the draft survey that was developed as part of PDP 3.0 deliberations (see https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/pdp-3-13-wg-member-survey-leadership-performance-10feb20-en.pdf [gnso.icann.org]) a helpful starting point?
c. Discuss next steps & approach
ACTION ITEM: Staff to summarize feedback to the survey questions and circulate to the CCOICI members to review. 4. Confirm action items & next meeting
ACTION ITEM: Staff will schedule the next meeting for Wednesday, 10 November at 13:00 UTC. |