Page History
...
| Item # | Category | Source of Request | Date of Request | Action Item Request | Action Owner | Anticipated Completion Date* | Progress Notes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 469 | General | 117 | 8 July 2020 | Laurin to review the recommendation 4 text in different documents and merge them ahead of next week’s meeting. | Laurin | 15 July 2020 | |||||||
| 468 | General | 117 | 8 July 2020 | Staff to find out the process and timeline for next steps on the NCAP study, if ICANN org plans to publish a view on the report, and if so, when? | ICANN org | 15 July 2020 | |||||||
| 467 | General | 115 | 24 June 2020 | Team members to review the Risk subteam text ahead of the 1 July meeting. | Team members | 1 July 2020 | 462 | General | 113 | 10 June 2020 | Kerry-Ann to update recommendation 6 to include privacy text once other changes to recommendation 6 have been made. | Kerry-Ann | |
| 15 July 2020 | 455 | General | 111 | 27 May 2020 | Staff to provide information about the implementation of the CCT recommendations that have been accepted by the Board. | ICANN org | 10 June 2020 | ||||||
| 452 | General | 110 | 20 May 2020 | Review team members to continue to work in subgroups and update the bar chart as work progresses. | Review Team | 1 July 2020 | |||||||
| 451 | General | 110 | 20 May 2020 | Staff to update the work plan based on the review team’s new completion date. | ICANN org | 27 May 2020 | |||||||
| 449 | General | 11 May 2020 | Q: It was announced earlier this year that Verisign will give ICANN $20 million over five years, beginning next year, “to support ICANN's initiatives to preserve and enhance the security, stability, and resiliency of the DNS.” Why (were there SSR vulnerabilities identified by Verisign and/or ICANN for which funding was needed)? Would you please provide the SSR2 with details on what specific activities ICANN will be using these funds for, next year and in subsequent years, (beyond the general categories mentioned in Goran’s March 27 announcement). What criteria and process is ICANN using to determine how to spend this SSR money? Goran stated that he “recognizes the request for accountability and transparency regarding how the funds are used and is committed to full transparency to provide the ICANN community the appropriate level of detail when available”-- please provide SSR2 more details on this, including how the funds and expenditures will be reflected and tracked in ICANN’s annual budget and operating plan. | ICANN org | TBD | ||||||||
| 448 | General | 5 May 2020 | Q: ICANN reportedly will be adding supplemental questions and criteria on DNS abuse to the registrar accreditation application (sounds promising). Please provide SSR2 with information about this including: the final or draft supplemental text; how ICANN will assess the answers; whether and how the answers will factor into ICANN’s decision to approve or deny an application; how ICANN will track and hold an approved registrar accountable for the registrar’s statements in the application regarding how the applicant intends to address DNS abuse as a registrar; and whether ICANN has plans to add similar supplemental DNS abuse questions and criteria to registrar contract renewals (why, why not). | ICANN org | TBD | ||||||||
| 442 | General | 107 | 8 Apr 2020 | KC to share proposed text that she believes should be included in the report with regard to prioritization, as articulated on the call. | KC | 15 Apr 2020 |
...
