Versions Compared

Old Version 8

changes.mady.by.user Julie Hedlund

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Julie Bisland

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Tip
titlePARTICIPATION
Attendance & Zoom chat

Apologies:  Erica Varlese (standing apologies - she will let us know when to discontinue)Varlese


Note

Notes/ Action Items

Actions:

  1. Timeline: Staff will communicate with GNSO Council Leadership to see if they want a DT update on the agenda for ICANN65 to provide an update and present the documents that have been submitted for Council review.
  2. Section 18.12 Special IFRs: David McAuley will redraft Section 4.5 GIP Outcomes and Processes
  3. Section 1.3 Approval Action Community Forum: Staff will revise after considering ccNSO GRC guidelines and send for review.
  4. Section 2.2 Petition Process for Specified Actions and 2.3 Rejection Action Community Forum: Staff will revise after considering ccNSO GRC guidelines and send for review.


Notes:

  1. Updates to Statements of Interest: No updates.

2. Timeline:  

ACTION: Staff will communicate with GNSO Council Leadership to see if they want a DT update on the agenda for ICANN65 to provide an update and present the documents that have been submitted for Council review.


3. Section 18.12 Special IFRs

a. Guidelines for How to Use the GNSO Input Process for a Special IFR

4.1 Introduction

-- “Must select a decision process and document its deliberations and decisions.  Council [may use the GIP to determine]...”  -- keep it simple.

-- Or could say, “should consider”.


4.3 and 4.4: -- Resolve Wolf-Ulrich’s comment -- don’t make the change.  This reflects the order of the GIP.


4.5 GIP Outcomes and Processes

-- Question: Section 4.5 GIP will be seeking input from SOs/ACs, but it’s not clear if this has happened or will be in conjunction with ccNSO.

-- Interpret as ccNSO and GNSO doing it together and it would have been completed.

-- There is also the issue of public comment.  It is confusing in this document.

-- Need to note the time for consultation with SOs/ACs and public comment.

-- Flag for redrafting. See suggested language in the text by Steve DelBianco.  

ACTION: David McAuley agreed to review and redraft.


b. ccNSO/GNSO guidelines

-- staff is drafting, inquiry into ICANN Legal on initiation of a Special IFR

-- Maxim’s concerns about what is the “consultation”?

-- Make it clear in the guidelines what the outcome is with the discussion with Legal.


4. Section 1.3 Approval Action Community Forum: ACTION: Staff will revise after considering ccNSO GRC guidelines and send for review.

5. Section 2.2 Petition Process for Specified Actions and 2.3 Rejection Action Community Forum: ACTION: Staff will revise after considering ccNSO GRC guidelines and send for review.



...