Page History

Versions Compared

Old Version 9

changes.mady.by.user Grace Abuhamad

Saved on Nov 19, 2014

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Grace Abuhamad

Saved on Nov 20, 2014

Key

This line was added.
This line was removed.
Formatting was changed.

Attendees:

Members: Wanawit Ahkuputra; Jaap Akkerhuis; Donna Austin; Fouad Bajwa; Graeme Bunton; Fatima Cambronero; Olivier Crepin-Leblond; Eduardo Diaz; Lise Fuhr; Robert Guerra; Erick Iriarte; Staffan Jonson; Paul Kane; Elise Lindeberg; Vika Mpisane; Seun Ojedeji; Jonathan Robinson; Greg Shatan

Participants: Guru Acharya; Martin Boyle; Keith Davidson; Stephanie Duchesneau; Amr Elsadr; Lars-Erik Forsberg; Chuck Gomes; Alan Greenberg; Geetha Hariharan; Gary Hunt; Malcolm Hutty; Manal Ismail; Boyoung Kim; Stacey King; Wolf-Ulrich Knoben; Pitinan Kooarmornpatana; Allan MacGillivray; Camino Manjon-Sierra; Antonio Medina Gómez; Desiree Miloshevic; Sivasubramanian Muthusamy; Minjung Park; Jorg Schweiger; Claudia Selli; Matthew Shears; Maarten Simon; Mary Uduma; Peter Van Roste.

Staff: Grace Abuhamad; Bart Boswinkel; Berry Cobb; Marika Konings; Jim Trengrove; Bernard Turcotte; Theresa Swinehart

Apologies:

**Please let Grace know if your name has been left off the list (attendees or apologies).**

...

Triage of existing provisions to look into granularity of the contract
How can these help in shaping the framework proposal
Is this going to be included as an appendix to the final proposal? Not decided yet - at best it will be added as an appendix. Could also serve as a check-list for the CWG and not include it in the proposal that is submitted.
As part of RFP3, triage document should be reviewed to ensure that those elements that are deemed necessary are covered by the eventual proposal
Might be helpful to reference and/or share with the community as it may help understand how CWG conducted its work and ended up with suggested proposal.
Column C - when are those expected to be discussed? Action: Chairs to come back with response.