Page History

Joining late: Desiree Miloshevic 

Apologies:  none

Attendance: 

Audio Recording

Zoom Recording (including audio, visual, rough transcript and chat)

GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar

Notes/ Action Items

ACTION ITEMS/NEXT STEPS:

1. Leadership and staff to send to the Group to review revised slides to suggest some draft details around the proposals on membership structure and decision-making for a Council update presentation at the 16 May meeting;
2. Group members to provide feedback in the form of suggested edits, if any,by Wednesday, 01 May so the presentation can be finalized and delivered to Council by the 06 May deadline for materials for the 16 May meeting.

Notes:

1. Welcome and SOI Updates (5 mins)

• No SOI updates provided.

      2.Survey Review & Data Analysis (15 mins) – See attached slides. Start at slide 4.

See the materials on the wiki at:

https://community.icann.org/display/CCFOICI/c.+CCOICI+Pilot+Survey

https://community.icann.org/display/CCFOICI/c.+CCOICI+Pilot+Survey?preview=/302350647/326238278/Data_All_240321.pdf

https://community.icann.org/display/CCFOICI/c.+CCOICI+Pilot+Survey?preview=%2F302350647%2F326238279%2FCCOICI+Pilot+Survey+Result.pdf

Overview of the survey and data analysis.

3.Discussion on Survey Results (15 mins) – See attached slides.

Discussion/Questions:

• Why not keep the group going – there needs to be someplace to have discussions about improvements.  More alignment in the results than expected.
• Need to think about what should be the decision-making method.
• Are we fine with bringing this proposal to Council?
• If we change the membership then we need a concrete proposal.
• Two points:

• Membership structure: Need to look at why it was originally structured the way it was.  Was meant to be a oversight small team of Council members with Task Forces with broader participation from the community.  Not sure how we would change the oversight structure since it’s representational.
• Decision-making methodology: Helpful if this group would make suggestions.  Options:

• Full Consensus.
• Standard in the WG Guidelines.
• New method? Not in scope?

• Question: Doesn’t every decision go to Council to decide? Does it matter what methodology the CCOICI uses?  Do we want to point this out to Council?
• If we had the full range of decision-making (rather than Full) it might have made a difference to what we sent to Council.
• Need to be very clear what we are asking.
• We agree that we need to be more clear on what we are proposing for structure and decision-making – provide more detail.
• There was a previous group (SCI) on improvements implementation from a previous GNSO review.  It was disbanded when it completed its work.

  4.CIP-CCG Updates (15 mins) – See attached slides.

Discussion:

• CCOICI to discuss the principles on the list and provide feedback if any.
• The criteria and indicators will be based on these principles.

  5.Next Steps (5 mins)

ACTION ITEMS/NEXT STEPS:

   3.Leadership and staff to send to the Group to review revised slides to suggest some draft details around the proposals on membership structure and decision-making for a Council update presentation at the 16 May meeting;

   4.Group members to provide feedback in the form of suggested edits, if any,by Wednesday, 01 May so the presentation can be finalized and delivered to Council by the 06 May deadline for materials for the 16 May meeting.

  6. AOB (5 mins)