Page History

...

Recordings: See here

Transcript: EN (p 34-42)

Slides: /

GAC Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Input:

• Question 1: How can we ensure someone using .BANK is really a bank?Spain: Nielsen survey would be more representative if users who are average users of Internet had been surveyed as they are more prone to be victims of fraud. 
  --> It was not a filtering question but a question that was used for cross-tabulation. 
• Spain: Take into account the conclusion that more than 70% respondents favored some level of registration restrictions on both legacy and new gTLDs as this is an increase from 2015. 
• Spain: Survey should have been broader. 
• Denmark/UK: Have new gTLD rounds had an impact on cost benefit? 
  --> Competition/Consumer Choice Team is responsible for the cost benefit analysis. Cost is often in form of defensive registrations although difficult to measure. 
• 's an experiment to see whether or not a restricted string can lead to an increase in consumer trust that will be taken up by the industry it is meant to represent. 

• Kavouss Arasteh: What are the tools that are used for self-evaluation or self-validationDenmark: Will defensive registration be included in the survey and report?
  --> We are going to conduct a study of brand owners probably through INTA to get an understanding of costs associated with the new gTLD program. UK: Will the review look at opportunities for small and medium-size enterprises? 
  --> We will ask applicants the degree to which costs was a barrier to entry. The Applicant Support Program was underuser.develoing the tools now to perform those evaluations. Future reviews might have an easier job because we will have established a lot of parameters used to measure success of programs going forward. 
• Daniel Ebanks: How do you qualify as an underserved region?
  --> We will make our own definitions and seek public input on those so they can be refined, as needed.