Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees:

Team:   Carlos Raul Gutierrez, Kaili, Kan, Drew Bagley, Jonathan Zuck, Laureen Kapin,

Gaonglalewe Mosweu, Fabri Steibel,  Waudo SIganga, Jordyn Buchanan, Calvin Browne, Megan Richards

Observers:  None.

Staff:  Jean-Baptiste Deroulez, Pamela Smith, Brian Aitchison, Eleeza Agopian, Antonietta Mangiacotti , Margie Milam, Alice Jansen

Apologies:    Carlton Samuels, Jamie Hedlund, Dejan Dukic, David Taylor

Agenda:  

AGENDA

  1. Research updates
    1. DNS Abuse Study
    2. Economic Study
    3. NTLD Stats
  2. Stan’s “wish list”
  3. Plenary call preps

- Welcome, roll roll-call, SoI  SoI (2 5 min)

-Build recommendations based on Competition & Consumer Choice High-level findings (45 min) Basic Market Share Consultations & Size Distribution of TLDs (Stan)
 Concentration Ratios (Jordyn)
 Price Analysis (Stan)
 Registrar Competition with Registries (Waudo)
 Registry Policies (Dejan)
 Registrations in new gTLDs available in .com (Jordyn)
 URS vs. UDRP (Dejan)
 Use .BRAND TLDs (Waudo)
 Benefits vs. Confusion to end users (Megan)
 Trademarks (Stan)
 Industry Structures (Stan)
 Effect of new gTLD entry on concentration (Stan)

- Build recommendations based on Safeguards & Trust High-level findings (45 min)     

-        Has the New gTLD Program Put Sufficient Mechanisms in In Place to Mitigate risks to the Trustworthiness of the DNS? papers i.e.          o

  • Have the Safeguards been Implemented in a Manner that Promotes Effective Enforcement?
                  
        • Technical safeguards (Calvin)
                  
        • Implemented GAC safeguards (Laureen)
                  
        • Voluntary PICs 5drew, Laureen)
                  
        • RPMs (David)
                o
        • Have the New gTLD Operators complied with:
                      
              • Technical safeguards (Fabro)
                      
              • GAC implemented safeguards (Fabro)
                      
              • RPMs (David)
                    o
            • What was the impact of the New Safeguards on DNS Abuse? (Drew)
                    o
            • Did the New Rights Protection Mechanisms mitigate certain risks involved with the Expansion of the New gTLD program? (David)

                      -        Has the New gTLD program put mechanisms in to improve trustworthiness in the DNS?           o

          • Background of History of GAC Safeguards and new Registry Agreement (Laureen)
                    o
          • Description of Technical Safeguards and Implementation (Calvin)
                    o
          • Description of Safeguards Applicable to all gTLDs and Implementation (Laureen)
                    o
          • Description of Safeguards Applicable to sensitive/highly regulated gTLDs and Implementation (Laureen)
                    o
          • Description of Voluntary Public Interest Commitments (Drew/Laureen
          /Jamie
          • )
                    o
          • Description of Rights Protection Mechanisms (David)

                      -        Effectiveness of Procedures to Enforce Safeguards          o

          • Are the new procedures effective in enforcing safeguards? (Carlton)

                      -        Have these efforts had an impact on public perception of the DNS? papers?          o

          • What is the level of consumer awareness of the new gTLDs? (Carlton, Gao)
                    o
          • Have consumers expressed trust in the new gTLD program efforts? (Laureen)
                    o
          • Has consumer trust in the DNS improved overall since the introduction of new gTLDs? (Jamie)

            

               - Identify findings on Application and Evaluation paper (15 min)         

          -        Was the application and evaluation process effective at addressing the needs of underserved areas and markets? (Waudo)

               - Determine required additional research (5 min)      

          - Draft report structure & next steps (5 min)     

          - A A.O.B (3 5 min)


          Documents:

          Recordings:

          Chat Transcript:  EN  EN

          Transcript:  EN

          Notes:

            EN

          Notes:

          Recommendations Template: Given Finding X, we see a deficiency/excess/limitation Y and therefore recommend Z to address it.

           

          * ST-02. Technichal Safeguards_Calvin v4: 

          •       Rec 1:  Calvin to review Compliance Reporting to restate the first recommendation to be more specific
          •       Rec. 2:  Calvin to update 2nd recommendation to reference known costs of safeguards (by cost center - registrar, registrant, etc.)
          •      New Rec:  ICANN to be whitelisted & not rate limited for WHOIS lookups
          •  ACTION ITEM:   ICANN to get info from WHOIS ARS on rate limiting challenges

          *ST-Voluntary PICs_Drew_v2:

          •       Rec:  Registries to self report on voluntary pics
          •  ACTION ITEM:   Drew and Carlos to come up with language on self reporting recommendation

          * CCC FINDINGS:

          gTLD Market:

          •  ACTION ITEM:  ICANN legal to provide information on whether ICANN should be collecting price data directly

          Parking:

               Effects of parking - DNS abuse study

              Assertions of increased parking with new gTLD's and negative effects of parking  

          •  New Rec:   Recommendations to study parking