Page History
Members (A) Sections 1 (Application Processing) and 5 (Transition to Delegation): Carlton Samuels, Carlos Raul Gutierrez, Jordyn Buchanan
(B) Section 2 (Application Evaluation): Fabro Steibel, Carlton Samuels, Calvin Browne, Stanley Besen, Kaili Kan
(C) Sections 3 (Objection Procedures) and 4 (Contention Resolution): Jamie Hedlund, David Taylor, Megan Richards, Dejan Djukic, Laureen Kapin, Waudo Siganga
(D) Sections 6 (Applicant Support), 7 (Continuing Operations Instrument) and 8 (Program Management): Gaongalelwe Mosweu, Jonathan Zuck, Drew Bagley
includes ALL RT Members)
Your chapters available at https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/program-review-29jan16-en.pdf
Mailing-list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cctreview-application/
 Application & Evaluation related work now moved to plenary calls and mailing-list |
|---|
| Recommendations tool |
Mandate
This sub team was created to explore one area of review as outlined in Section 9.3 of the Affirmation of Commitments: The effectiveness of the application and evaluation process in the introduction of new gTLDs.
Mailing-list archives:
http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cctreview-application/
| Refer to Application & Evaluation Process - Calls for your call schedule and archives. |
|---|
Documents
| Document | File |
|---|
Application & Evaluation process brainstorming
| WORK PLAN | |
| v1 (18 May) |
|
Reading List/Data Sources
Reading List
| Date Added | Document | File |
|---|
| 29 Jan 2016 | Program Implementation Review Report A) Sections 1 (Application Processing) and 5 (Transition to Delegation): Carlton Samuels, Carlos Raul Gutierrez, Jordyn Buchanan (B) Section 2 (Application Evaluation): Fabro Steibel, Carlton Samuels, Calvin Browne, Stanley Besen, Kaili Kan (C) Sections 3 (Objection Procedures) and 4 (Contention Resolution): Jamie Hedlund, David Taylor, Megan Richards, Dejan Djukic, Laureen Kapin, Waudo Siganga (D) Sections 6 (Applicant Support), 7 (Continuing Operations Instrument) and 8 (Program Management): Gaongalelwe Mosweu, Jonathan Zuck, Drew Bagley |
| 3 June 2016 | Making Waves – Stories for Participatory Communication |
Was the application and evaluation process effective at addressing the needs of underserved areas and markets?
1. Were there specific identifiable barriers to entry and participation for participants from emerging economies? 2. Was Applicant Support effective? 3. Were Dispute Resolution mechanisms of particular concern to applicants? 4. Were potential applicants encouraged to be providers for their specific geographic areas? | Waudo | v1 |
|---|
Templates
| Document | File |
|---|---|
Rounds | |
How many string contention objections were raised and what was the outcome on New gTLD applications? In particular what was the result of singular/plural string contentions? | |
How did GAC formal advice or GAC early warnings (GAC EWG) influence or affect the New gTLD applications? |
1. Were there specific identifiable barriers to entry and participation for participants from emerging economies?
2. Was Applicant Support effective?
3. Were Dispute Resolution mechanisms of particular concern to applicants?
4. Were potential applicants encouraged to be providers for their specific geographic areas?
