Page History
Members (includes ALL RT Members)
Your chapters available at https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/program-review-29jan16-en.pdf
Mailing-list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cctreview-application/
 Application & Evaluation related work now moved to plenary calls and mailing-list |
|---|
| Recommendations tool |
Mandate
This sub team was created to explore one area of review as outlined in Section 9.3 of the Affirmation of Commitments: The effectiveness of the application and evaluation process in the introduction of new gTLDs.
| Refer to Application & Evaluation Process - Calls for archives. |
|---|
Documents
| Document | File |
|---|---|
| BRAINSTORMING DOCUMENT | |
v1 (22 Feb) | |
| v2 (22 Feb) | DOC - PDF |
| v3 (3 May) | |
| v4 (18 May) | PPT - PDF |
| v5 (1 June) | PPT - PDF |
| WORK PLAN | |
| v1 (18 May) |
|
Reading List/Data Sources
| Date Added | Document | File |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Jan 2016 | Program Implementation Review Report A) Sections 1 (Application Processing) and 5 (Transition to Delegation): Carlton Samuels, Carlos Raul Gutierrez, Jordyn Buchanan (B) Section 2 (Application Evaluation): Fabro Steibel, Carlton Samuels, Calvin Browne, Stanley Besen, Kaili Kan (C) Sections 3 (Objection Procedures) and 4 (Contention Resolution): Jamie Hedlund, David Taylor, Megan Richards, Dejan Djukic, Laureen Kapin, Waudo Siganga (D) Sections 6 (Applicant Support), 7 (Continuing Operations Instrument) and 8 (Program Management): Gaongalelwe Mosweu, Jonathan Zuck, Drew Bagley |
| 3 May 2016 | Requests for reconsideration FINAL | XLSX |
| 19 May 2016 | Ry-RSP geographic comparison | ZIP |
| 3 June 2016 | Making Waves – Stories for Participatory Communication | |
| 3 June 2016 | RAJAR UK Radio Audience Survey |
Was
Mandate
This sub team was created to explore one area of review as outlined in Section 9.3 of the Affirmation of Commitments: The effectiveness ofthe application and evaluation process
ineffective at addressing the
introduction of new gTLDs.
Mailing-list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cctreview-application/
| Refer to Application & Evaluation Process - Calls for your call schedule and archives. |
|---|
Documents
Brainstorming key questions v1
needs of underserved areas and markets?
1. Were there specific identifiable barriers to entry and participation for participants from emerging economies? 2. Was Applicant Support effective? 3. Were Dispute Resolution mechanisms of particular concern to applicants? 4. Were potential applicants encouraged to be providers for their specific geographic areas? | Waudo | v1 |
|---|
Templates
| Document | File |
|---|---|
Rounds | |
How many string contention objections were raised and what was the outcome on New gTLD applications? In particular what was the result of singular/plural string contentions? | |
How did GAC formal advice or GAC early warnings (GAC EWG) influence or affect the New gTLD applications? |
1. Were there specific identifiable barriers to entry and participation for participants from emerging economies?
2. Was Applicant Support effective?
3. Were Dispute Resolution mechanisms of particular concern to applicants?
4. Were potential applicants encouraged to be providers for their specific geographic areas?
Application & Evaluation proces brainstorming
