Page History
...
For other times: https://tinyurl.com/y7h8l5u3
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA
BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS Public Comment Review Tool - new gTLD Auction Proceeds Initial Report - 17 Dec 2018.pdf |
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: Peter Vergote, Sebastien Bachollet, Marika Konings (staff), Hadia Elminiawi, Marilyn Cade |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items Notes & Action Items - New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting - 19 December at 14:30 UTC These high-level notes are designed to help the CCWG navigate through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the transcript and/or recording. The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided separately and are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/DLHDAw.
2. Welcome & DOI/SOI updates
3. High-level overview of public comment review tool
Lay-out:
4. Next steps for reviewing public comments 4 types of comments:
Action item #1: Following a proposal by the chair and co-chair: the leadership team and staff will do a first analysis of the comments received, by grouping them into categories. (comments related to our charter questions/recommendations; new comments; comments that relate to the implementation phase; comments related to what is implicitly stated)
2 assumptions:
Note that Marika is currently OOO and ICANN offices are closed next week. Re-opens again on 2 January. Timeline for initial analysis to be determined shortly. 5. CCWG meeting schedule
Action item #2: Secretariat to share a poll via the mailing list, to determine the preferred time for the future calls, under the assumption that calls will happen every 2 weeks. 6. Next steps for work plan towards Final Report The need for a second public comment period depends on the content of the next report. Noting feedback from the Board received from the public comment period: "If the report changes significantly as a result of Public Comment, the Board would encourage a second period of Public Comment to make sure that the community and beyond have opportunities to comment on any material changes to the approach and options set forth in this draft before submission to the Chartering Organizations for adoption." 7. Reconfirmation of membership attendance is dropping. do we need to reconfirm membership, to remind people about the important work? Comments from the group that there is no need to reconfirm membership, that it would be hard to bring new members up to speed at this stage. Others mentioned that there is a lot of work still to be done, and we should ensure the CCWG has adequate resources. Action item #3: reconfirmation of membership to be discussed again at the end of the next meeting. 8. AOB Scheduling of future meetings needs to be verified against the work by other groups as well. Thank you all. Happy holidays. |