AT-LARGE GATEWAY

At-Large Website

ALAC

RALOs

At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)

At-Large Governance

At-Large Reports

Policy Comments & Advice

Working Groups

ICANN Meetings

At-Large Summit (ATLAS III)

At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development

ALAC and RALO Elections, Selections, and Appointments

At-Large Priority Activities - 2021

Versions Compared

Old Version 19

changes.mady.by.user Alan Greenberg

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Matt Ashtiani

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 5.3
Comment Close
Date		Statement
Name 

Status

Assignee(s) and
RALO(s)

Call for
Comments		Call for
Comments
Close 		Vote
Announcement 		Vote OpenVote
Reminder		Vote CloseDate of SubmissionStaff Contact and EmailStatement Number
23.10.2013Revised Public Interest Commitments Dispute Resolution Procedure (PICDRP)

VotingAdopted
12Y, 0N, 1A 

Alan Greenberg (NARALO)

30.10.201306.11.201307.11.201307.11.201311.11.201312.11.201313.11.2013Krista Papac
krista.papac@icann.org TBC		AL-ALAC-ST-1113-02-00-EN
Comment / Reply Periods (*)
Comment Open Date: 
2 October 2013
Comment Close Date: 
23 October 2013 - 23:59 UTC
Reply Open Date: 
24 October 2013
Reply Close Date: 
14 November 2013 - 23:59 UTC

...

FINAL VERSION TO BE SUBMITTED IF RATIFIED

Please click here to download a copy of the PDF below.

PDF
nameAL-ALAC-ST-1113-02-00-EN.pdf
The final version to be submitted, if the draft is ratified, will be placed here by upon completion of the vote. 

FINAL DRAFT VERSION TO BE VOTED UPON BY THE ALAC

...

  • The use of the undefined term “good standing” is both vague and inappropriate. If there are criteria under which ICANN will decide to not follow up on a report, they must be clearly stated and subject to appeal.
  • There should be no requirement for interaction between a Reporter and Registry if the complaint issues identified in the report are factually identifiable; there is no need to negotiate evidence-based issues.
  • Although perhaps obvious to some, it should be explicit that the Standing Panel will include one or more members with clear understanding of Public Interest issues.

Although this document is specifically on the process by which ICANN will address third-party reports on PIC violations, it is essential that ICANN makes it clear that ICANN may as well choose to take action against PIC violations purely on its own accord.

...