AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
Page History
...
Action Items: EN
Transcript: EN, FR
Recording: EN, FR
Chat: EN
...
Dial Out Participants:
FR: Montrésor Konan Gabriel Bombambo, Olévié Olevie Kouami, Adetokunbo AbiolaMichel Tchonang Linze, Ramanou Biaou, Aziz Hilali,
EN: Daniel Nanghaka, Barrack Otieno, Beran Dondeh, Nkem Nweke, Chibuzor Nicodemus, Vernatius Okwu Ezeama, Abdulkarim Ayopo Oloyede, Emmanuel OnwugbuforEmmanuel Onwugbufor, Yaovi Atohoun, Bram Fudzulani, Ejikeme Egbuogu, Dave Kissoondoyol, Sarah Kiden, Ben Kyemba, Janvier Ngnoulaye, Seun Ojedeji, Falobi Femi, Eduardo Diaz, Liz Orembo, Raihanath Gbadamassi, Christiane Anaky, Maureen Hilyard, Pastor Peters, Bakary Kouyate,
Apologies: Tijani Ben Jemaa, Mohamed El Bashir, Beran Dondeh,Apologies: Tijani Ben Jemaa, Mohamed El Bashir
Staff: Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Claudia Ruiz
Interpreters: Isabelle and Jacques
Call Management: Claudia Ruiz
...
Agenda: TO BE UPDATED
- Roll call (Staff) – 2 min
- Review of action items from previous meeting (Mohamed, Fatimata, Sarah, Staff) – 3 min
- Open ICANN Public Comments (Mohamed) – 5 min
...
At-Large Policy Resources
2019 ALAC Policy Comments & Advice
At-Large Policy Summary
At-Large Executive Summary page
Multistakeholder Advice Development graphic
The ALAC notes that there has yet to be a discussion about whether any new gTLDs are needed. In case of an expansion, first and foremost, (1) strings with geographic connotations should not present harm (eg. risk for confusion) to end-users and (2) end-users, as residents of a given geographic entity, should have a say, through their governments or public authorities, in how its name is used. The ALAC prefers preventative protection mechanisms for country, territory, sub-national place and capital names. In the case of non-capital city names, there is a balanced support within the ALAC for either (1) requiring support or a non-objection letter from the relevant authority only if the applicant intends to use the TLD primarily for purposes associated with the city or (2) requiring support or a non-objection letter in any case. As to the 2012 AGB, ALAC thinks that its final version generally worked well and supports, in general, its treatment of geographic names.
Current Statements (ALAC Advice, Comment or Correspondence)
Public Comment Name | Public Comment Close | Status |
---|
Penholder(s) |
---|
CPWG Discussion
At-Large Workspace: Consultation on Neustar's Proposal for 3-Phased New gTLD Application Model
CPWG Discussion
Justine Chew
ICANN Draft FY20 Operating Plan and Budget and Five-Year Operating Plan Update |
8 February 2019
|
|
11 February 2019
|
| ||||||||
Updated Operating Standards for Specific Reviews |
|
|
20 February 2019
Comment
Judith Hellerstein
(TBC)
25 February 2019
TBC
|
|
4. Reports
a.Recent and upcoming ALAC activities (Tijani, Seun, Hadia) – 5 min
...
- Appel (Staff) – 2 min
- Revue des action à entreprendre, issues de la dernière reunion (Mohamed, Fatimata, Sarah) – 5 min
Consultations Publiques Ouvertes (Mohamed) – 5 min
Voir ICANN Public Comment et
At-Large Policy Resources
2019 ALAC Policy Comments & Advice
At-Large Policy Summary
At-Large Executive Summary page
Multistakeholder Advice Development graphic
The ALAC notes that there has yet to be a discussion about whether any new gTLDs are needed. In case of an expansion, first and foremost, (1) strings with geographic connotations should not present harm (eg. risk for confusion) to end-users and (2) end-users, as residents of a given geographic entity, should have a say, through their governments or public authorities, in how its name is used. The ALAC prefers preventative protection mechanisms for country, territory, sub-national place and capital names. In the case of non-capital city names, there is a balanced support within the ALAC for either (1) requiring support or a non-objection letter from the relevant authority only if the applicant intends to use the TLD primarily for purposes associated with the city or (2) requiring support or a non-objection letter in any case. As to the 2012 AGB, ALAC thinks that its final version generally worked well and supports, in general, its treatment of geographic names.
Current Statements (ALAC Advice, Comment or Correspondence)
Public Comment Name | Public Comment Close | Status | Penholder(s) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICANN Draft FY20 Operating Plan and Budget and Five-Year Operating Plan Update |
|
| |||||||
|
| ||||||||
Updated Operating Standards for Specific Reviews |
|
| |||||||
|
|
4. Rapports
Activités récents et à venir de l'ALAC (Tijani, Seun, Hadia) - 5 min
Activités récents et à venir des membres d'AFRALO (tous) - 5 min
5. Sujets pour discussion
La réunion conjointe AFRALO-AfrICANN (Sarah, Mohamed) - 5 min
6. Nouvelles demandes d'ALS (Sarah, Mohamed, Fatimata) – 5 min
7. Question diverses (tous) – 5 min