Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 5.3
Comment Close
Date
Statement
Name 

Status

Assignee(s) and
RALO(s)

Call for
Comments
Call for
Comments
Close 
Vote
Announcement 
Vote OpenVote
Reminder
Vote CloseDate of SubmissionStaff Contact and EmailStatement Number
27.08.2013Rights Protection Mechanism (RPM) RequirementsVotingAdopted
13Y, 0N, 0A 
26.08.201302.09.201304.09.2013
00:01 UTC 
04.09.2013
00:01 UTC
09.09.201310.09.201311.09.2013Karen Lentz
karen.lentz@icann.orgTBC
AL-ALAC-ST-0913-03-01-EN
Comment / Reply Periods (*)
Comment Open Date: 
6 August 2013
Comment Close Date: 
27 August 2013 - 23:59 UTC
Reply Open Date: 
28 August 2013
Reply Close Date: 
18 September 2013 - 23:59 UTC

...

FINAL VERSION TO BE SUBMITTED IF RATIFIED

Please click here to download  a copy of the PDF below.

PDF
nameAL-ALAC-ST-0913-03-01-EN.pdf
The final version to be submitted, if the draft is ratified, will be placed here by upon completion of the vote. 

FINAL DRAFT VERSION TO BE VOTED UPON BY THE ALAC

...

The option of relying on the TLD Registry Operator’s “IDN variant policies” has the disadvantage of resulting in differentiating IDN variant treatment for the same trademark across TLDs, which will cause inconsistent user experience as well as user confusion.  Furthermore, the revised requirements for Trademark Claims as they are currently formulated will serve only part of the global IDN user community (see Annex 1 A for elaboration).

Annex A: Why the Trademark Claims Requirement Serves Only Part of the Global IDN User Community

...