Page History
Attendees:
Members: Wanawit Ahkuputra; Jaap Akkerhuis; Donna Austin; Fatima Cambronero; Graeme Bunton; Olivier Crepin-Leblond; Eduardo Diaz; Avri Doria; Lise Fuhr; Robert Guerra; Erick Iriarte; Staffan Jonson; Paul Kane; Elise Lindeberg; Vika Mpisane; Seun Ojedeji; Jonathan Robinson; Greg Shatan
Participants: Guru Acharya; Wale Bekare; Martin Boyle; Gary Campbell; Keith Davidson; Stephanie Duchesneau; Amr Elsadr; Lars-Erik Forsberg; Alan Greenberg; Feng Guo; Geetha Hariharan; Gary Hunt; Malcolm Hutty; Boyoung Kim; Stacey King; Wolf-Ulrich Knoben; Allan MacGillivray; Camino Manjon-Sierra; Desiree Miloshevic; Sivasubramanian Muthusamy; Minjung Park; Kurt Pritz; Jorg Schweiger; Claudia Selli; Matthew Shears; Maarten Simon; Mary Uduma; Peter Van Roste; Jiankang Yao.
Staff: Grace Abuhamad; Bart Boswinkel; Berry Cobb; Marika Konings; Jim Trengrove; Bernard Turcotte; Theresa Swinehart
Apologies: Chuck Gomes;
**Please let Grace know if your name has been left off the list (attendees or apologies).**
...
Notes & Action Items
Chair to take a stab at combining Functional approach and strawman. Shared in a table IAAN Transition Flow Chart 20 November 2014
...
IANA Customer Standing Committee, customers, periodic operational review, transactional review. Committee is always there.
Periodic review team escalation path from IANA Customer Standing committee,
- Periodic review of its own, Multistakeholder. Predefined in terms which constituency have a seat at the table, individual members, Seat are defined by whom appoints members.
Independent Standing Policy review Committee, Appeal on decisions under policy. Policy implementation appels mechanism.
...
IANA Contracting Entity Is this entity that decides which components are in the contract? Vehicle to be used as counter
...
- Short form: some kind of arbitration
- Adjudicating whether decision under policy is in accordance in policy.
- Change Independent Standing Policy review Committee -> decisions is conformance with agreed policy
- When IANA treats request, appeal should focus
- policy for IANA transactions.
Refer to policy list in current IANA Functions contract .
Truely independentTruly independent, and reference to principles document. Dispute
...
Reference to ICC and its arbitration rules.
...
Link to CWG accountability
...
Example for appeals
- gTLD string not in conformity with policy
- No Board decision
...
- Refusal to delegate?
Why Truely independent policy decision appeals panel
...
- Why truly independent policy decision appeals panel
- Multistakeholder model as arbitrator
- Suggestion to rename to Independent Appeals Panel for Policy Implementation Decisions
...
- Who can appeal?
- See Strawman
...
- Affected or impacted parties in brackets, concepts needs to be refined.
- Subject to further revision
- Threshold for harm needs to be defined.
...
- Issue some could be harmed by the policy itself,
...
ccTLD Survey: binding appeals 49 % in favour. At the same time vast majority of ccTLD maangers consider they are ultimate responsible for the ccTLd and not ICANN.
...
...
Will panel make a recommendation or decision?
...
Expectation understanding now: iti is binding
...
...
IANA Contracting Entity
...
- Composition not discussed, could be same entity as periodic review review. Committee needs to have.
...
...
- Building bridges with protocol and addressing communities, who will need to be involved.
...
- No presumption that another entity needs to be established.
- Currently only two groups/teams.
...
- General bodies/
...
...
- groups characteristics how perform functions.
Continuation of session on Table ( 10.55-12.45 UTC)
Interrelationship between Bodies
Interreaaltionship between Bodies
...
- cross reference with strawman, may have to be done on line.
...
...
- Not covered Authorization role in structure
...
- Is it addressed? will it be addressed?
...
...
- Various entities or groups are set. Common understanding
...
- Interrelation between the periodic review team and contracting entity.
In order to stay minimalistics the periodic review team needs to have substance.
...
- In order to stay minimalists the periodic review team needs to have substance.
- In order to stay minimalistic periodic review team, needs to act as kind of supervisor.
...
- Periodic review needs to be multi-
...
- stakeholder
- Contract review is bound by Function group 2.
Contract reveiw is bound by Function group 2.
...
- Yesterdays outcome suggest there is no longer an Authorization role.
...
...
- IANA executes, and in case necessary, appeal mechanism comes in play..
...
...
- Contracting entity, driven by periodic review.
- As far as substance of contact, parts will be dealt with by Accountability discussion.
...
- As far periodic review, some only come to table only for contracting review activities.
...
- The composition of contract review characteristics, may be multi-stakeholder.
...
- as well periodic review
- Empty seat could have same names,
...
- the persons filling the seat could be different.
- By what teams are supposed, you get interested people.
- The periodic review team, may use others
Core is open participatory entities which are transparant.
- Core is open participatory entities which are transparent.
- Any review team, actively solicits views from outside the team.
...
- Erasing of Authorization step, will put more pressure on IANA. Removing of Authorization needs to be revisited in context of RFP 4.
...
- Working assumption is Authorization is in square brackets, meaning it will need to be revisited.
...
- Is Authorization component
...
...
- Significant difference between gTLD and ccTLD
- Reference to ccTLD survey results.
in ccTLD authorization is an honoreus task.
...
- in ccTLD authorization is an difficult task.
- Option to fill seats on Periodic review team and contracting entity and its composition
...
...
- Alternative could be open participation.
...
- Reaction on closed or open group
...
- If groups attract people with different skill-sets, agenda,
...
- and interests.
- Depending on aspect dealt with by periodic review team.
- Periodic review team could be split in line with aspect it deals with for example, along lines of operational lines or preparing contracting.
...
- Different skills sets defined by required output of periodic review team.
...
- Does it need to be split?
...
- Build cases, to check developed structure
...
- This is part of RFP 4 , i.e flows into stress testing.
...
...
- Authorization function: performed by USG, hence not questioned.
- Alternative option, analysis of reports produced by IANA.
- Example IANA reports need to include GAC advise was followed. GAC is revisiting interpretation of some of its advices
...
Does it bleed into Accountability?
...
Concerns:
...
Putting back a gate-keeper.
...
Where did the system go wrong? In case of example, the wrong was at the ICANN side and not the IANA side. The issue needs to be addressed at level where problem lies.
...
- Independent review is there for corner cases as well under proposed structure.
- Work on Authorization may be closely linked with work on accountability. Hence close eye on what is happening in Accountability group.
- Perception some taks are already performed in ICANNPerception some talks are already performed in ICANN.
- New committee Function 1 ( IANA Customer standing committee), for customers (all ccTLD and gTLDs). and liaisons (from multistakeholder)
Periodic review team, multistakeholder.
IANA customer committee., may have a coordination tasks, to invoke escalation.
...
Does this group needs to review the Accountability work. What is process moving forward? in particular around accountability
...
- Co-chairs need to liaise with Accountability track, to ensure work of this group is not disrupted.
After escalation Periodic review team may act. Contracting entity could defer part of its mandate to periodic review to ensure issues are followed up
- Realtionship with Acountability process unclearRelationship with Accountability process unclear.
- Perception two tracks are not linked
- Percpetion that accountability needs to be linked with transitionPerception that accountability needs to be linked with transition.
- Accountability needs to be fed into to proposal, whilst others believe it will only happen indirectly, Accountability CWG reports to Board.
- Leave palceholders are neede dot be left in placeLeave placeholders are need dot be left in place.
Transcript
The transcript will be posted here upon receiptis available here: MeetingF2F_Session2_Nov20.doc
Recording
The Adobe Connect recording is available here: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p7kn16384ca/
The audio recording is available here: https://icann.box.com/shared/static/ckoir73bi3biaspjovr4.mp3
...
