AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
Page History
Comment Close Date | Statement Name | Status | Assignee(s) and | Call for Comments | Call for Comments Close | Vote Announcement | Vote Open | Vote Reminder | Vote Close | Date of Submission | Staff Contact and Email | Statement Number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
28.02.2013 | At-Large Consultation on ccTLD Delegation and Redelegation Performance Standards Workspace | CommentingAdopted 11Y, 0N, 0A |
| 19.03.2013 | 20.03.2013 | 21.03.2013 | 21.03.2013 | 27.03.2013 | 28.03.2013 | 21.03.2013 | Michelle Cotton michelle.cotton@icann.orgTBC | AL/ALAC/ST/0313/3 |
Comment/Reply Periods (*) | Important Information Links | |||
Comment Open: | 15 January 2013 | |||
Comment Close: | 28 February 2013 | |||
Close Time (UTC): | 23:59 | Public Comment Announcement | ||
Reply Open: | 1 March 2013 | To Submit Your Comments (Forum) | ||
Reply Close: | 21 March 2013 | View Comments Submitted | ||
Close Time (UTC): | 23:59 | Report of Public Comments | ||
Brief Overview | ||||
Originating Organization: | ICANN | |||
Categories/Tags: | Top-Level Domains | |||
Purpose (Brief): | A consultation on developing performance standards for Delegation and Redelegation of a Country Code Top Level Domain (ccTLD) | |||
Current Status: | Initial public consultation | |||
Next Steps: | Review comments received | |||
Staff Contact: | Michelle Cotton | Email: | michelle.cotton@icann.org | |
Detailed Information | ||||
Section I: Description, Explanation, and Purpose | ||||
The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) functions contract (SA1301-12-CN-0035) between ICANN and the United States Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications Information Administration (NTIA) to maintain the continuity and stability of services related to certain interdependent Internet technical management functions, known collectively as the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority calls for a public consultation from all interested and affected parties to help satisfy the following objective:
This consultation involves the operation of the Delegations and Redelegations of Country Code Top Level Doamins (ccTLDs) described in the IANA functions contract as the following: C.2.9.2.c Delegation and Redelegation of a Country Code Top Level-Domain (ccTLD) –The Contractor shall apply existing policy frameworks in processing requests related to the delegation and redelegation of a ccTLD, such as RFC 1591 Domain Name System Structure and Delegation, the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) Principles And Guidelines For The Delegation And Administration Of Country Code Top Level Domains, and any further clarification of these policies by interested and affected parties as enumerated in Section C.1.3. If a policy framework does not exist to cover a specific instance, the Contractor will consult with the interested and affected parties, as enumerated in Section C.1.3; relevant public authorities; and governments on any recommendation that is not within or consistent with an existing policy framework. In making its recommendations, the Contractor shall also take into account the relevant national frameworks and applicable laws of the jurisdiction that the TLD registry serves. The Contractor shall submit its recommendations to the COR via a Delegation and Redelegation Report. | ||||
Section II: Background | ||||
This is one of a series of consultations to establish performance standards for the delivery of the IANA functions, as described in contract SA1301-12-CN-0035. | ||||
Section III: Document and Resource Links | ||||
Section IV: Additional Information | ||||
None |
...
FINAL VERSION TO BE SUBMITTED IF RATIFIED
Please click here to download a copy of the PDF below.
|
FINAL DRAFT VERSION TO BE VOTED UPON BY THE ALAC
The ALAC recognises and understands why this consultation is occurring now, but we do note that it is, to some extent, unfortunate timing with regard to redelegations.
|
ccTLD: The ccNSO Working Group on the review of the Framework of Interpretation (FOI-WG) aims to establish a community agreed consensus of the understanding of terms, meanings, usage, limitations and the intentions of RFC 1591, ICP-1 and the relevant GAC Advice (2000 and 2005) relating to the rare relatively occurrence of the ccTLD redelegation (see FOI-WG -http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/foiwg.htm). The WG has not completed its work, but it will report to the ccNSO Council and as stated in its Charter “... advise whether it should launch a Policy Development Process to recommend changes to the current policies for delegation, re‐delegation and retirement of country code Top Level Domains …”.
...