Page History

...

1. Welcome  - Sergio Salinas (1 minute).
2. Agenda Aproval - Harold Arcos (2 minutes).
3. Presentation of the New Leadership Proposal – Sergio Salinas (10 minutes)
   New Working Groups
   
4. ATLAS III.  Olivier Crepin-Leblond (10 minutes)
   
5. ALAC Member Report - Humberto Carrasco (10 - 15 minutes)
   
6. .AMAZON-Carlton Samuels (15 minutes)
7. Orientation Call - New ALSs-Harold Arcos (5 minutes)
8. AOB (5 minutes)
9. Webinar GSE - Next-Generation gTLD Registration Directory Services to Replace Whois - Rubens Kuhl de Brasil   (25 minutes).  
10. Webinar GSE - Evaluation  (5 minutes).
    

ALAC Policy Activities 

See: 2018 ALAC Policy Comments & Advice

Recently Ratified by the ALAC

ICANN Seeking Community Feedback on Proposed Unified Access Model
The ALAC cited their prior statement from 10 April 2018 relating to the access of WHOIS, and offered (4) general comments on the proposed UAM: (1) Any access model must be compliant with the GDPR, and ICANN should obtain legal advice from expert counsel to confirm compliance; (2) Internet end user rights should be part of the calculus, including knowledge of email sender identity, et al; (3) The UAM design should be scalable and not overly-reliant upon manual updates, and should have a well-defined taxonomy of abuse types, et al. Once an agreed upon set of inputs and outcomes is established, an automated system may be created to respond to WHOIS requests; (4) The various harms taken into account when considering the UAM must be done so in a non-biased fashion.

Proposed gTLD-Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile
The ALAC recommends that ICANN adopt the RDAP quickly and effectively because they hold it is an essential step for ICANN to deploy a tiered-access model adequately. In addition, the ALAC recommends that ICANN address 5 ambiguities in the RDAP that are also present in the European Union's (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), noting them in the statement. 

Next Steps on Reviews
The ALAC supports the proposed path forward for the ATRT3, while stating the consideration of how to streamline specific reviews to make them more effective and impactful is a low priority item for ATRT3. The ALAC encourages active community participation in formulating any recommendations in organizational reviews, and states that specific reviews operating standards should take a minimalist approach.

Public Comment for Decision

• Policy Status Report: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) 24 Dec 2018 
• Application for New Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) Dispute-Resolution Service Provider 04 Jan 2019 

Current Statements (ALAC Advice, Comment or Correspondence)