Versions Compared

Old Version 50

changes.mady.by.user Ariel Liang

Saved on

compared with

New Version 51

changes.mady.by.user Ariel Liang

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Deck of Cards
idURS Proposals
Card
labelPresentation Order & Schedule

I. Suggested Operational Fix

Order No.ProponentTopicFileTentative Presentation DateStatus
1Kristine Dorrain

B. NOTICE

3. Other topics

URS-Proposal-1.pdf

 

Status
colourGreen
titlePresentation Completed

2Maxim Alzoba

F. REMEDIES

2. Duration of Suspension Period

3. Review of Implementation

URS-Proposal-2.pdf

 

Status
colourGreen
titlePresentation Completed

3Zak Muscovitch

F. REMEDIES

2. Duration of Suspension Period

3. Review of Implementation

URS-Proposal-3.pdf

 

Status
colourGreen
titlePresentation Completed

4George Kirikos

F. REMEDIES

4. Other topics

URS-Proposal-4.pdf

 

Status
colourGreen
titlePresentation Completed

II. Draft Policy Recommendation 

Order No.

ProponentTopic (Mapped to the Super Consolidated URS Topics Table)FileTentative Presentation Date
5George Kirikos

A. THE COMPLAINT

3. Limited filing period

URS-Proposal-5.pdf

 


6Claudio DiGangi

A. THE COMPLAINT

8. Other topics

URS-Proposal-6.pdf

 

Status
colourGreen
titlePresentation Completed

7George Kirikos

B. NOTICE

1. Receipt by registrant (Notice - feedback from Complainant & Respondent)

URS-Proposal-7.pdf

 



8George Kirikos

C. RESPONSE

1. Duration of response period

URS-Proposal-8.pdf 



9David McAuley

C. RESPONSE (primary topic)

1. Duration of response period

==

G. APPEAL (secondary topic)

2. De novo review

URS-Proposal-9.pdf

 

Status
colourGreen
titlePresentation Completed

10Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

C. RESPONSE (primary topic)

1. Duration of response period

==

G. APPEAL (secondary topic)

2. De novo review

URS-Proposal-10.pdf

 

Status
colourGreen
titlePresentation Completed

11Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

C. RESPONSE

3. Response fee

URS-Proposal-11.pdf

 

Status
colourGreen
titlePresentation Completed

12George Kirikos

D. STANDARD OF PROOF

1. General

URS-Proposal-12.pdf



13Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies

URS-Proposal-13.pdf

TBD



14Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies

URS-Proposal-14.pdf

TBD


15Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies

URS-Proposal-15.pdf

 

Status
colourGreen
titlePresentation Completed

16Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies

2. Duration of suspension period

URS-Proposal-16.pdf

 

Status
colourGreen
titlePresentation Completed

17Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

F. REMEDIES

2. Duration of suspension period

URS-Proposal-17.pdf

TBD


18George Kirikos

G. APPEAL

1. Appeals process

URS-Proposal-18.pdf



19George Kirikos

G. APPEAL

1. Appeals process

URS-Proposal-19.pdf



20George Kirikos

G. APPEAL

1. Appeals process

URS-Proposal-20.pdf



21Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

I. COST

1. Cost allocation model

URS-Proposal-21.pdf

TBD



22Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

I. COST

1. Cost allocation model

URS-Proposal-22.pdf

 


23George Kirikos

I. COST

1. Cost allocation model

URS-Proposal-23.pdf



24George Kirikos

J. LANGUAGE ISSUES

1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination

URS-Proposal-24.pdf

 

Status
colourGreen
titlePresentation Completed

25Zak Muscovitch

J. LANGUAGE ISSUES

1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination

URS-Proposal-25.pdf

 

Status
colourGreen
titlePresentation Completed

26Zak Muscovitch

M. URS PROVIERS

1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists)

URS-Proposal-26.pdf

 


27Zak Muscovitch

M. URS PROVIERS

1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists)

URS-Proposal-27.pdf

 


28Zak Muscovitch

M. URS PROVIERS

2. Conflict of interest

URS-Proposal-28.pdf

 


29George Kirikos

M. URS PROVIDERS

(no applicable subheading at present)

URS-Proposal-29.pdf

 


30George Kirikos

N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES

1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g. summary procedure in the UDRP

URS-Proposal-30.pdf

 


31David McAuley

(no applicable subheading at present)

URS-Proposal-31.pdf

 


III. Other 

Order No.ProponentTopicFileTentative Presentation Date
32George Kirikos

N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES

1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g., summary procedure in the UDRP

URS-Proposal-32.pdf

 


33George Kirikos(no applicable subheading at present)

URS-Proposal-33.pdf





Card
labelQuick Download

Click the files below to quickly download URS Proposals. You may click "Download All" at the bottom to mass download all URS Proposals.

Attachments
oldfalse
sortBycreateddate

...