Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

"Towards a more innovative and revitalised At-Large"

Category

1 = Low Needs
2 =Medium Needs
3 = High Needs
4 = Unassigned
Task DescriptionsIssue Numbers (where relevant)At-Large Review Implementation Overview Proposal TextTask Type

Risk Level

1 = Low
2 = Medium
3 = High


Penholder(s)ProgressStarting DateTarget Completion from At-Large Review Implementation OverviewNo. Weeks
1

Implementation Development



Goal
Maureen Hilyard

17%

Status
colourBlue
titleIn progress

28/08/2018
17

Meetings

Implementation Activity






ARIWG formed and has met; project introduced.

Implementation Activity1Maureen Hilyard

100%

Status
colourGreen
titleCompleted

28/08/2018
1
Introduction completedMilestone












Quality vs quantity of ALAC advice#1

Staff, under the direction of At-Large


leadership, has already begun to


rework the website and Wiki to ensure that our “Policy Advice” pages are accurate and understandable. This will continue as volunteer and staff resources allow. We will also ensure that as documents are published, the classification of the document is clear.

Implementation Activity1Jonathan Zuck
and
, Marita Moll and Alberto Soto

0%

Status
titleTo Start

28/08/20186-9 months17

Leadership Team (ALT), which is not mandated by ICANN Bylaws, concentrates in the established leadership too many decision-making and other administrative powers which should be spread among the members of the ALAC.#4

The ALAC Chair will work with members


of the ALAC and staff to better


communicate the role and activities of


the ALT ensuring that it is clear what the


ALT does and does not do.

Implementation Activity1Maureen Hilyard and Hadia Elminiawi

0%

Status
titleTo Start

28/08/20183 months.17

Excessive amounts of At-Large Community time spent on process and procedure at expense of ALAC’s mandated responsibilities to produce policy advice and coordinate outreach and engagement activities. Too many internal working groups are a distraction.#7

The ALAC has begun to review our WGs,


ensuring that the ones we have are


active and relevant. We have also


started the process to revamp our WG


web and Wiki presence to ensure that


all WGs are properly represented and


documented. Groups no longer active


will be segregated, but still documented

for historical purposes

Implementation Activity1Javier Rúa-Jovet and Ricardo Holmquist

0%

Status
titleTo Start

28/08/20186 months and then ongoing.17

Absence of consistent performance metrics.#16

The ALAC has had a Metrics WG and an


ALS Review Taskforce, both of which


largely went into stasis during the IANA
Transition and Accountability efforts. It


is proposed to revive this activity as part


of the At-Large Review Implementation.
The ALAC notes that regional differences make it more difficult to have uniformity over participation metrics, but agrees that is an important target.


The ALAC notes that collecting such


statistics is a staff-intensive operation.

Implementation Activity1Dev Anand Teelucksingh and Joanna Kulesza (& Maureen Hilyard)

0%

Status
titleTo Start

28/08/2018

Nine months
to design, and
then ongoing,
with a checkpoint
one year after
collection
starts, all
presuming
availability of
staff

resources.
17
Category 1 completed
Milestone











2

Need for increased At-Large Community awareness and staff training regarding the use of social media.

#9

The ALAC will request additional staff


skill development in the area of social


media, and to work cooperatively with


ICANN Communications social media


specialists.

Implementation Activity
John Laprise
and
, Holly Raiche and Sergio Salinas Porto

0%

Status
titleTo Start

28/08/2018

1 year and
then ongoing,
presuming
appropriate
staff
availability.

17

Uneven contribution of At-Large to a coordinated ICANN strategy for ‘Outreach and Engagement’. Missed opportunities for coordination with other constituencies and ICANN staff.#5 (similar to #12)

To the extent allowed by ICANN’s


mission and available funding, members


of At-Large and the At-Large


organizations will continue to, and


potentially increase, our involvement
with other I* organizations as a method


for increasing the visibility of At


-Large, exploring areas for mutual collaboration and for attracting additional At-Large volunteers.

At-Large will continue to work closely


with GSE Staff to contribute to regional


outreach plans and to encourage
participation in a cross


-community, cross-organizational fashion.

Implementation Activity
Tijani Ben Jemaa and Seun Ojedeji

0%

Status
titleTo Start

28/08/2018Ongoing.17

Need more systematic RALO participation in regional events#13

At-Large Staff working with relevant


departments to develop a single


location which will point to travel funding opportunities and


documentation of what resources were


ultimately distributed, to the extent


supported by those ICANN entities providing funding and reports.

Implementation Activity
Glenn McKnight and Daniel Nanghaka

0%

Status
titleTo Start

28/08/2018Six months.17
Category 2 completedMilestone











3

At-Large has struggled to reflect/process end-user opinion; barriers to individual participation; perception of unchanging leadership group.

#2

At-Large is increasingly focusing on


individuals (both unaffiliated At-Large


Members as well as members within
each ALS) instead of just ALS voting representatives. Four of the five


(RALOs) allow individual members and


the fifth, LACRALO, has already


approved the concept and is developing


the detailed rules. We will also use the


ALSes to communicate with those within


an ALS who may have an interest in


ICANN.
RALOs have also started to identify


experts on ICANN topics within their


ALSes and among individual members


and to increasingly engage them in


ALAC’s policy work. Thus, a bi-
directional flow of ICANN information continues to be strengthened.

These activities will require the production of information that is truly


understandable (as identified in a recent


ALAC-GAC Joint Statement) and


available in multiple languages. As some
of this will need to be created by At-


Large staff, additional resources may be


needed.


We would suggest that At-Large Staff


continue to work together with At-


Large Leadership in looking for effective


methodologies to coach and onboard
new policy volunteers and leaders to


facilitate the development of their skills


and encourage them to stay and deepen


their knowledge and expertise.

Regarding the perception of unchanging


leadership, statistics reporting


involvement will be published.

Implementation Activity3Bastiaan Goslings
and
, Bartlett Morgan and Sarah Kiden

0%

Status
titleTo Start

28/08/20182 years and ongoing.17

Staff resources are disproportionately concentrated on administrative support. Staff should have greater capacity to support preparation of policy advice.#3

Continue to look for opportunities to


utilize and develop the skills of At


-Large support staff while ensuring that the positions taken by At-Large represent solely those of users. Ensure that the volunteer community has sufficient support services so as to best utilize their volunteer time.

This may require a shift or development


of skills among At-Large Staff as well as additional staff.

Implementation Activity3Holly Raiche and Hadia Elminiawi

0%

Status
titleTo Start

28/08/2018

1-2 years
presuming
staff resources
available.

17

Election processes are excessively complex and have been open to allegations of unfairness.#6

At-Large will continue to evolve its


processes through its bottom


-up, consensus based, community deliberations and update as and when


needed.

Implementation Activity3Sébastien Bachollet and Alan Greenberg

0%

Status
titleTo Start

28/08/2018Ongoing.17

Social media and other Internet-based tools could be used more effectively, and at minimal cost, to continuously survey and channel end-user input into ICANN policy making processes.#8

We will continue to investigate


opportunities to use Social Media and


other online tools that prove useful to


bring end-users’ voices to ICANN and


vice -versa. However, we caution against


seeing social media and online tools as a
substitute for other means of


participation. We are eager to work with


ICANN Organization to understand


ICANN’s interests in this area, and the


tools available to integrate and
communicate our work more


effectively.

Implementation Activity3John Laprise and Dev Anand Teelucksingh

0%

Status
titleTo Start

28/08/2018Ongoing.17

There are a multitude of communications channels used by At Large. This has led to fractured and undocumented communications.#10

The ALAC Technology Taskforce


regularly reviews various
communications tools with the aim of


improving At-Large participation.


The At-Large Community is very diverse
and the selection of any new tools must


accommodate this diversity. We will


also need to continue to investigate


how we can overcome the lack of


affordable communications for many of

our participants and future participants.

Implementation Activity3Dev Anand Teelucksingh
and
, John Laprise and Sergio Salinas Porto

0%

Status
titleTo Start

28/08/2018Ongoing.17

While broadly popular, Global ATLAS meetings every 5 years have been difficult to organize and short on effective results. More frequent regional meetings would be more effective in encouraging both policy input and outreach while familiarizing more of At Large with workings of ICANN.
#11

The ALAC will proceed with its plans as


approved by the Board, pending


appropriate funding.
As with all At-Large activities, there will


be an increased focus on tracking and


metrics.

Implementation Activity3Olivier Crepin-Leblond, Eduardo Diaz and Humberto Carrasco

0%

Status
titleTo Start

28/08/2018Ongoing.17
Category 3 completed
Milestone











4

ALAC input to a coordinated ICANN Outreach sub-optimal.

#12 (similar to #5)

As noted in Issue 5, the ALAC supports


such external activity to the extent that


funding is available and it coincides with
ICANN’s mission.
Increases in such funding would be


appreciated, but in light of
the FY19 draft budget, we are now in a mode of trying to minimize


impact of the proposed cuts to such


activities.

Implementation Activity3Maureen HilyardAlan Greenberg, Cheryl Langdon-Orr
28/08/2018N/A17

Need for an innovative approach to funding a revitalized At-Large.#14

It is the understanding of the ALAC that At-Large may only be funded from ICANN operational funds.

Implementation Activity3Maureen HilyardAlan Greenberg, Cheryl Langdon-Orr
28/08/2018N/A17

Need to reinforce impact of outreach and engagement activities.#15

As noted previously, subject to available


funding, we do look for opportunities to


explain At-Large and attract new participants at non-ICANN events. When


opportunities have arisen where funds


are available to bring a targeted group
to an ICANN meeting with a good


potential for future involvement, we


have done so.

Implementation Activity3Maureen HilyardAlan Greenberg, Cheryl Langdon-Orr
28/08/2018N/A17
Category 4 completedMilestone