AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
Page History
Topic # | New gTLD Program Topics | At-Large Position |
---|---|---|
1 | The objection procedures including the requirements for governments to pay fees; | Specifically, we wish to emphasize, as strongly as possible, our support for the CWG's consensus calls to:
|
2 | Procedures for the review of sensitive strings; |
|
3 |
|
|
4 | Market and Economic Impacts; |
|
5 | Registry – Registrar Separation; |
|
6 | Protection of Rights Owners and consumer protection issues; |
|
7 | Post-delegation disputes with governments; |
|
8 | Use and protection of geographical names; |
|
9 | Legal recourse for applicants; | Dispute "Resolution" (Attachment to Module 3, Article 3) |
10 | Providing opportunities for all stakeholders including those from developing countries; | Applicant Support (Module 1, Section 1.2.10) |
11 | Law enforcement due diligence recommendations to amend the Registrar Accreditation Agreement as noted in the Brussels Communiqué |
|
12 | The need for an early warning to applicants whether a proposed string would be considered controversial or to raise sensitivities (including geographical names). | At-Large has always been generally against the very principle of gTLD string objections based on "morality and public order". |