Page History
...
| No. | Proponent | Topic (Mapped to the Super Consolidated URS Topics Table) | Deferred to Phase 2? | File | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | George Kirikos | A. THE COMPLAINT 3. Limited filing period | Yes | URS-Proposal-05 Sep 2018-1.pdf | |
| 6 | Claudio DiGangi | A. THE COMPLAINT 8. Other topics | URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-9.pdf | ||
| 7 | George Kirikos | B. NOTICE 1. Receipt by registrant (Notice - feedback from Complainant & Respondent) | Yes | URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-5.pdf | |
| 8 | George Kirikos | C. RESPONSE 1. Duration of response period | Yes | URS-Proposal-04 Sep 2018-3.pdf | |
| 9 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | C. RESPONSE (primary topic) 2. Other issues relating to Responses (other than issues relating to Defenses), e.g. Default procedures == G. APPEAL (secondary topic) 2. De novo review | URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-10.pdf | ||
| 10 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | C. RESPONSE 3. Response fee | URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-14.pdf | ||
| 11 | George Kirikos | D. STANDARD OF PROOF 1. General | Yes | URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-6.pdf | |
| 12 | Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies | |||
| 13 | Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies | |||
| 14 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies | |||
| 15 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies 2. Duration of suspension period | |||
| 16 | Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | F. REMEDIES 2. Duration of suspension period | |||
| 17 | George Kirikos | G. APPEAL 1. Appeals process | Yes | ||
| 18 | George Kirikos | G. APPEAL 1. Appeals process | Yes | ||
| 19 | George Kirikos | G. APPEAL 1. Appeals process | Yes | ||
| 20 | David McAuley | G. APPEAL 2. De novo review | |||
| 21 | Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | I. COST 1. Cost allocation model | |||
| 22 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | I. COST 1. Cost allocation model | |||
| 23 | George Kirikos | I. COST 1. Cost allocation model | Yes | ||
| 24 | George Kirikos | J. LANGUAGE ISSUES 1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination | |||
| 25 | Zak Muscovitch | J. LANGUAGE ISSUES 1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination | |||
| 26 | Zak Muscovitch | M. URS PROVIERS 1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists) | |||
| 27 | Zak Muscovitch | M. URS PROVIERS 1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists) | |||
| 28 | Zak Muscovitch | M. URS PROVIERS 2. Conflict of interest | |||
| 29 | George Kirikos | M. URS PROVIDERS (no applicable subheading at present) | URS-Proposal-28 Aug 2018-1.pdf | ||
| 30 | George Kirikos | N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES 1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g. summary procedure in the UDRP | Yes | ||
| 31 | David McAuley | (no applicable subheading at present) | URS-Proposal-30 Aug 2018-1.pdf |
...
