Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

II. Draft Policy Recommendation 

No.ProponentTopic (Mapped to the Super Consolidated URS Topics Table)Deferred to Phase 2?FileNotes
5George Kirikos

A. THE COMPLAINT

3. Limited filing period

YesURS-Proposal-05 Sep 2018-1.pdf
6David McAuley

A. THE COMPLAINT

8. Other topics


URS-Proposal-30 Aug 2018-1.pdf
7Claudio DiGangi

A. THE COMPLAINT

8. Other topics


URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-9.pdf
8George Kirikos

B. NOTICE

1. Receipt by registrant (Notice - feedback from Complainant & Respondent)

YesURS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-5.pdf
9George Kirikos

C. RESPONSE

1. Duration of response period

YesURS-Proposal-04 Sep 2018-3.pdf
10Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

C. RESPONSE

2. Other issues relating to Responses (other than issues relating to Defenses), e.g. Default procedures


URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-10.pdf
11Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

C. RESPONSE

3. Response fee


URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-14.pdf
12George Kirikos

D. STANDARD OF PROOF

1. General

YesURS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-6.pdf
13Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies



14Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies



15Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies



16Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies

2. Duration of suspension period



17Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

F. REMEDIES

2. Duration of suspension period



18George Kirikos

G. APPEAL

1. Appeals process

Yes
19George Kirikos

G. APPEAL

1. Appeals process

Yes


20George Kirikos

G. APPEAL

1. Appeals process

Yes
21David McAuley

G. APPEAL

2. De novo review



22Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

I. COST

1. Cost allocation model



23Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

I. COST

1. Cost allocation model



24George Kirikos

I. COST

1. Cost allocation model

Yes
25George Kirikos

J. LANGUAGE ISSUES

1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination



26Zak Muscovitch

J. LANGUAGE ISSUES

1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination



27Zak Muscovitch

M. URS PROVIERS

1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists)



28Zak Muscovitch

M. URS PROVIERS

1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists)



29Zak Muscovitch

M. URS PROVIERS

2. Conflict of interest



30George Kirikos

M. URS PROVIDERS

(no applicable subheading at present)


URS-Proposal-28 Aug 2018-1.pdf
31George Kirikos

N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES

1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g. summary procedure in the UDRP

Yes


III. Other 

No.ProponentCategoryTopicDeferred to Phase 2?FileTentative Presentation Date
31
32George KirikosElimination of URS procedure entirely

N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES

1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g., summary procedure in the UDRP


URS-Proposal-05 Sep 2018-6.pdf
32

33George KirikosURS and UDRP Providers themselves to be brought under contract with ICANN(no applicable subheading at present)YesURS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-8.pdf