Page History
I. Suggested Operational Fix
| No. | Proponent | Topic | Deferred to Phase 2? | File | Tentative Presentation Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kristine Dorrain | B. NOTICE 3. Other topics | URS-Proposal-05 Sep 2018-5.pdf | ||
| 2 | Maxim Alzoba | F. REMEDIES 2. Duration of Suspension Period 3. Review of Implementation | URS-Proposal-29 Aug 2018-1.pdf | ||
| 3 | Zak Muscovitch | F. REMEDIES 2. Duration of Suspension Period 3. Review of Implementation | URS-Proposal-31 Aug 2018-2.pdf | ||
| 4 | George Kirikos | F. REMEDIES 4. Other topics | URS-Proposal-27 Aug 2018-1.pdf |
III. Other
| No. | Proponent | Category | Topic | Deferred to Phase 2 | File | Tentative Presentation Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George Kirikos | Elimination of URS procedure entirely | N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES 1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g., summary procedure in the UDRPURS-Proposal-05 Sep 2018-6.pdf | George KirikosURS and UDRP Providers themselves to be brought under contract with ICANN | (no applicable subheading at present) | Yes | URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-8.pdf |
II. Draft Policy Recommendation
| No. | Proponent | Topic (Mapped to the Super Consolidated URS Topics Table) | Deferred to Phase 2 |
|---|
| ? | File | Notes |
|---|
| 5 | George Kirikos | A. THE COMPLAINT 3. Limited filing period | Yes | URS-Proposal-05 Sep 2018-1.pdf |
| 6 | David McAuley | A. THE COMPLAINT 8. Other topics | URS-Proposal-30 Aug 2018-1.pdf |
| 7 | Claudio DiGangi | A. THE COMPLAINT 8. Other topics | URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-9.pdf |
| 8 | George Kirikos | B. NOTICE 1. Receipt by registrant (Notice - feedback from Complainant & Respondent) | Yes | URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-5.pdf |
| 9 | George Kirikos | C. RESPONSE 1. Duration of response period | Yes | URS-Proposal-04 Sep 2018-3.pdf |
| 10 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | C. RESPONSE 2. Other issues relating to Responses (other than issues relating to Defenses), e.g. Default procedures | URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-10.pdf |
| 11 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | C. RESPONSE 3. Response fee | URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-14.pdf |
| 12 | George Kirikos | D. STANDARD OF PROOF 1. General | Yes | URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-6.pdf |
M. URS PROVIDERS
(no applicable subheading at present)
J. LANGUAGE ISSUES
| 13 | Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies |
J. LANGUAGE ISSUES
| 14 | Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies |
M. URS PROVIERS
| 15 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies |
M. URS PROVIERS
1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists)
| 16 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies 2. Duration of suspension period |
M. URS PROVIERS
2. Conflict of interestI. COST
1. Cost allocation model
| 17 | Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | F. REMEDIES 2. Duration of suspension period |
| 18 | George Kirikos |
G. |
APPEAL 1. |
Appeals process | Yes |
| 19 | George Kirikos | G. APPEAL |
1. Appeals process | Yes |
| 20 |
| George Kirikos | G. APPEAL 1. Appeals process | Yes |
| 21 |
| David McAuley | G. APPEAL 2. De novo review |
| 22 | Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) |
F. REMEDIES
2. Duration of suspension periodI. COST 1. Cost allocation model | ||||
| 23 | Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | I. COST 1. Cost allocation model |
| 24 | George Kirikos |
I. COST 1. Cost allocation model | Yes |
| 25 | George Kirikos | J. LANGUAGE ISSUES 1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination |
| 26 | Zak Muscovitch | J. LANGUAGE ISSUES 1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination | |||
| 27 | Zak Muscovitch | M. URS PROVIERS 1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists) |
F. REMEDIES
1. Scope of remedies| 28 | Zak Muscovitch | M. URS PROVIERS 1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists) |
F. REMEDIES
1. Scope of remedies| 29 |
| Zak Muscovitch |
M. |
URS PROVIERS 2. |
Conflict of interest |
| 30 |
| George Kirikos | N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES 1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g. summary procedure in the UDRP | Yes |
F. REMEDIES
1. Scope of remedies
III. Other
| No. | Proponent | Category | Topic | Deferred to Phase 2? | File | Tentative Presentation Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 |
| George Kirikos | Elimination of URS procedure entirely | N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES 1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g., summary procedure in the UDRP |
I. COST
1. Cost allocation model| URS-Proposal- |
| 05 Sep 2018- |
| 6.pdf | |
| 32 |
F. REMEDIES
1. Scope of remedies
2. Duration of suspension period| George Kirikos | URS and UDRP Providers themselves to be brought under contract with ICANN | (no applicable subheading at present) | Yes | URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018- |
| 8.pdf |
