Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

I. Suggested Operational Fix

No.ProponentTopicFileTentative Presentation Date
1Kristine Dorrain

B. NOTICE

3. Other topics

URS-Proposal-05 Sep 2018-5.pdf
2Maxim Alzoba

F. REMEDIES

2. Duration of Suspension Period

3. Review of Implementation

URS-Proposal-29 Aug 2018-1.pdf
3Zak Muscovitch

F. REMEDIES

2. Duration of Suspension Period

3. Review of Implementation

URS-Proposal-31 Aug 2018-2.pdf
4George Kirikos

F. REMEDIES

4. Other topics

URS-Proposal-27 Aug 2018-1.pdf

III. Other 

No.ProponentCategoryTopicDeferred to Phase 2FileTentative Presentation Date

George KirikosElimination of URS procedure entirely

N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES

1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g., summary procedure in the UDRP


URS-Proposal-05 Sep 2018-6.pdf

George KirikosURS and UDRP Providers themselves to be brought under contract with ICANN(no applicable subheading at present)YesURS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-8.pdf


II. Draft Policy Recommendation 

CategoryPolicy Policy
No.DateProponentTopic (Mapped to the Super Consolidated URS Topics Table)Phase 2 Topic?FileNotes
14George Kirikos

A. THE COMPLAINT

3. Limited filing period

YesURS-Proposal-05 Sep 2018-1.pdf
5David McAuley

A. THE COMPLAINT

8. Other topics


URS-Proposal-30 Aug 2018-1.pdf
28Claudio DiGangi

A. THE COMPLAINT

8. Other topics


URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-9.pdf
24George Kirikos

B. NOTICE

1. Receipt by registrant (Notice - feedback from Complainant & Respondent)

YesURS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-5.pdf
13George Kirikos

C. RESPONSE

1. Duration of response period

YesURS-Proposal-04 Sep 2018-3.pdf
29Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

C. RESPONSE

2

 

George Kirikos

. Other issues relating to Responses (other than issues relating to Defenses), e.g. Default procedures


URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-10.pdf
33Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

C. RESPONSE

3. Response fee


URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-14.pdf
25George Kirikos

D. STANDARD OF PROOF

1. General

YesURS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-6.pdf


















2George Kirikos

M. URS PROVIDERS

(no applicable subheading at present)


Yes
3George Kirikos

J. LANGUAGE ISSUES

1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination



5

 

David McAuleyPolicy

A. THE COMPLAINT

8. Other topics

URS-Proposal-30 Aug 2018-1.pdf





6

 

Zak MuscovitchPolicy

J. LANGUAGE ISSUES

1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination



8

 

Zak MuscovitchPolicy

M. URS PROVIERS

1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists)



9 Zak MuscovitchPolicy

M. URS PROVIERS

1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists)



10

 

Zak MuscovitchPolicy

M. URS PROVIERS

2. Conflict of interest



11

 

George KirikosPolicy

I. COST

1. Cost allocation model

Yes
12 George KirikosPolicy

N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES

1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g. summary procedure in the UDRP

Yes13

 

George KirikosPolicy

C. RESPONSE

1. Duration of response period

Yes14

 

George KirikosPolicyA. THE COMPLAINT

3. Limited filing period











Yes



15 George KirikosPolicy

G. APPEAL

2. De novo review

YesRelated proposals
16

 

George KirikosPolicy

G. APPEAL

1. Appeals process

Yes
17

 

George KirikosPolicy

G. APPEAL

2. De novo review

Yes
20 Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)Policy

F. REMEDIES

2. Duration of suspension period



21 Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)Policy

I. COST

1. Cost allocation model



22

 

Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)Policy

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies



23

 

Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)Policy

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies


25

 

George KirikosPolicy

D. STANDARD OF PROOF

1. General

Yes24

 

George KirikosPolicy

B. NOTICE

1. Receipt by registrant (Notice - feedback from Complainant & Respondent)

Yes












26

 

David McAuleyPolicy

G. APPEAL

2. De novo review


29

 

Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan PaynePolicy

C. RESPONSE

2. Other issues relating to Responses (other than issues relating to Defenses), e
28

 

Claudio DiGangiPolicy

A. THE COMPLAINT

8. Other topics

g. Default procedures












30 Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan PaynePolicy

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies



31

 

Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan PaynePolicy

I. COST

1. Cost allocation model



32 Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan PaynePolicy

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies

2. Duration of suspension period


33

 

Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan PaynePolicy

C. RESPONSE

3. Response fee