Page History
I. Suggested Operational Fix
No. | Proponent | Topic | File | Tentative Presentation Date |
---|
1 | Kristine Dorrain | B. NOTICE 3. Other topics | URS-Proposal-05 Sep 2018-5.pdf | |
2 | Maxim Alzoba | F. REMEDIES 2. Duration of Suspension Period 3. Review of Implementation | URS-Proposal-29 Aug 2018-1.pdf | |
3 | Zak Muscovitch | F. REMEDIES 2. Duration of Suspension Period 3. Review of Implementation | URS-Proposal-31 Aug 2018-2.pdf | |
4 | George Kirikos |
F. REMEDIES 4. Other topics | URS-Proposal-27 Aug 2018-1.pdf |
III. Other
No. | Proponent | Category | Topic | File | Tentative Presentation Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
George Kirikos | Elimination of URS procedure entirely | N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES 1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g., summary procedure in the UDRP | URS-Proposal-05 Sep 2018-6.pdf | ||
George Kirikos | URS and UDRP Providers themselves to be brought under contract with ICANN | (no applicable subheading at present) | URS-Proposal-06 Sep 2018-8.pdf |
II. Draft Policy Recommendation
No. | Date | Proponent | Category | Topic (Mapped to the Super Consolidated URS Topics Table) | Phase 2 Topic? | File | Notes | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | M. URS PROVIDERS (no applicable subheading at present) | Yes | ||||||||||||
3 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | J. LANGUAGE ISSUES 1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination | 4 | Maxim Alzoba | Operational Fix | ||||||||||
5 |
| David McAuley | Policy | A. THE COMPLAINT 8. Other topics | |||||||||||||
6 |
| Zak Muscovitch | Policy | J. LANGUAGE ISSUES 1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination | 7 |
| Zak Muscovitch | ||||||||||
Operational Fix | F. REMEDIES 2. Duration of Suspension Period 3. Review of Implementation | 8 |
| Zak Muscovitch | Policy | M. URS PROVIERS 1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists) | |||||||||||
9 |
| Zak Muscovitch | Policy | M. URS PROVIERS 1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists) | |||||||||||||
10 |
| Zak Muscovitch | Policy | M. URS PROVIERS 2. Conflict of interest | |||||||||||||
11 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | I. COST 1. Cost allocation model | Yes | ||||||||||||
12 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES 1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g. summary procedure in the UDRP | Yes | ||||||||||||
13 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | C. RESPONSE 1. Duration of response period | Yes | ||||||||||||
14 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | A. THE COMPLAINT 3. Limited filing period | Yes | ||||||||||||
15 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | G. APPEAL 2. De novo review | Yes | Related proposals | |||||||||||
16 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | G. APPEAL 1. Appeals process | Yes | ||||||||||||
17 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | G. APPEAL 2. De novo review | Yes | 18 |
| Kristine Dorrain | Operational Fix | B. NOTICE 3. Other topics | 19 |
| George Kirikos | Other (elimination of URS procedure entirely) | N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES 1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g., summary procedure in the UDRP | ||
20 |
| Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | Policy | F. REMEDIES 2. Duration of suspension period | |||||||||||||
21 |
| Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | Policy | I. COST 1. Cost allocation model | |||||||||||||
22 |
| Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | Policy | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies | |||||||||||||
23 |
| Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association) | Policy | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies | |||||||||||||
24 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | B. NOTICE 1. Receipt by registrant (Notice - feedback from Complainant & Respondent) | Yes | ||||||||||||
25 |
| George Kirikos | Policy | D. STANDARD OF PROOF 1. General | Yes | ||||||||||||
26 |
| David McAuley | Policy | G. APPEAL 2. De novo review | 27 |
| George Kirikos | Other (URS and UDRP Providers themselves to be brought under contract with ICANN) | (no applicable subheading at present) | Yes | |||||||
28 |
| Claudio DiGangi | Policy | A. THE COMPLAINT 8. Other topics | |||||||||||||
29 |
| Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | Policy | C. RESPONSE 2. Other issues relating to Responses (other than issues relating to Defenses), e.g. Default procedures | |||||||||||||
30 |
| Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | Policy | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies | |||||||||||||
31 |
| Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | Policy | I. COST 1. Cost allocation model | |||||||||||||
32 |
| Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | Policy | F. REMEDIES 1. Scope of remedies 2. Duration of suspension period | |||||||||||||
33 |
| Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne | Policy | C. RESPONSE 3. Response fee |