Page History

...

• See: Policy Advice Development Page
• See : ICANN Public Comment page
  

  Statements approved by the ALAC
  

  Initial Report on the Protections for Certain Red Cross Names in all gTLDs – Policy Amendment Process 
  The ALAC has always taken the position that as a humanitarian organization, and one that has been regularly the target of those seeking to fraudulently attract donations, the Red Cross should be afforded the courtesy of having its various identifiers protected at the second level in gTLD domain names.

  Short-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline for Specific Reviews 
  Of the three options presented on the public comment, the ALAC prefers the option to commence RT work upon Board action on CCWG-WS2 recommendations, to be started no later than end of June 2019. With this option, the review team will be in charge of the evaluation of implementation of prior review recommendations and other topics, with no duplication or overlap with CCWG-WS2 implementation. 

  Long-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline of Reviews 
  The ALAC approached the comment by separating it into two issues: (1) Organizational Reviews and (2) Specific Reviews. The ALAC recommended ICANN Org stop initiating Organizational Reviews until its is it has assessed how effective they have been and develop a methodology to allow them to be cost effective and effective overall. The ALAC also recommends changing the Bylaws to give the Board more flexibility with the timing of Specific Reviews going forward.

  Open Data Initiative Datasets and Metadata 
  The ALAC made specific comments in relation to: (1) Centralized, easy access to properly organized data repository, (2) Types and value of data collected, lack of discernable information; (3) Uniformity of and responsibility for data; and (4) Privacy rights. Overall, the ALAC believes it would be useful if ICANN Org could assist in re-generating a list of datasets with suggestions on what downstream or upstream information can possibly be gleaned from each dataset. 

  Statements in process - Drafting, Comment or Vote

  Drafting ICANN Seeking Community Feedback on Proposed Unified Access Model  Internal Deadline: 31 Aug 2018
  Penholder(s):Gregory Shatan

  Comment IPC/BC Accreditation & Access Model for Non-Public Data v1.7 Internal Deadline: 31 Aug 2018  Note: Not a formal ICANN public comment.
  Penholder(s):Jonathan Zuck

  Drafting Draft ICANN Africa Strategic Plan 2016-2020 Version 3.0 10 Sep 2018 
  Penholder(s): Fatimata Seye Sylla
  
  Comment Recommendations for Managing IDN Variant Top-Level Domains 17 Sep 2018 
  Penholder(s): Satish Babu

  Drafting Initial Report on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (Overarching Issues & Work Tracks 1-4) 26 Sep 2018 
  Penholder(s):Jonathan Zuck

  Statements that seem to be stalled

  • • None

  Public Comment requests to which the ALAC decided not to submit Statements

  • • The Independent Review Process Implementation Oversight Team (IRP-IOT) Draft Recommendations
    • Proposed Renewal of .COOP Sponsored Registry Agreement
    • Proposals for Kannada, Oriya and Telugu Scripts' Root Zone Label Generation Rules
    • Study on Technical Use of Root Zone Label Generation Rules 

  New Public Comment requests to which the ALAC needs to make decisions

  • • Modification of Domains Protected Marks List Service

    • Proposed gTLD-Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Profile

  Upcoming Public Comment Requests

  September

  • • Registration Directory Service Review Team (RDS-WHOIS2) Draft Report
      
    • Implementation of Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Program
      
    • Recommendations on the Technical Use of the Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
      
    • Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Policy Status Report

...

Long-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline of Reviews 
The ALAC approached the comment by separating it into two issues: (1) Organizational Reviews and (2) Specific Reviews. The ALAC recommended ICANN Org stop initiating Organizational Reviews until its is it has assessed how effective they have been and develop a methodology to allow them to be cost effective and effective overall. The ALAC also recommends changing the Bylaws to give the Board more flexibility with the timing of Specific Reviews going forward.

...