AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
Page History
...
Nominee | Nominated and Supported by | Date Nominee Accepted | Nominee's Statement | SOI | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eduardo Diaz | Glenn McKnight |
| I would like to get the opportunity to continue leading the region into identifying, understanding and discussing ICANN's most pressing policy issues affecting end-users, continuing supporting our outreach efforts to bring-in more members to our all-ready top notch membership, and providing a good educational program geared to understand policy issues and to keep all of us abreast of what is important and what is not. | SOI | Eduardo Diaz by acclamation |
NARALO ALAC MEMBER - Two years term: 2018 AGM - 2020 AGM
...
Nominee | Nominated and Supported by | Date Nominee Accepted | Nominee's Statement | SOI | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glenn McKnight | Eduardo Diaz Judith Hellerstein |
| I'm pleased to provide my experience and organizational skills to the task of working as Secretariat. We recently had a successful NASIG in Puerto Rico prior to ICANN 61 and we intend to work hard to replicate the same event in Montreal in late October 2019. Although we are the smallest RALO we have achieved a number of tangible results. Our monthly calls exceed 20 attendees. ( 34 on the March call), detailed monthly newsletter and a revised and proactive engagement with more members to be involved in our various subcommittees. | Glenn McKnight SOI | Glenn McKnight by acclamation |
NARALO 2018 NOMCOM DELEGATE - One year term: 2018 AGM - 2019 AGM
...
In IRV, each voter ranks all candidates in order of preference. Here is a possible set of ballots
| Candidate A | Candidate B | Candidate C |
Ballot 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Ballot 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Ballot 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Ballot 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
Ballot 5 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
Ballot 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Ballot 7 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Ballot 8 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Ballot 9 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Ballot 10 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Ballot 11 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Candidate A received 5 first preferences, Candidate B had 4 and Candidate C had 2, so no one had a majority of support.
...
