Page History

Notes/ Action Items

1.           

Roll

Call

  *  

• Roll

• call

• will

• be

• taken

• from

• Adobe

• Connect

• Please

• remember

• to

• state

• your

• name

• for

• transcription

• purposes

• and

• remember

• to

• mute

• your

• microphone

• when

• not

• speaking

2.           

Welcome

/

DOI

  *  

• Productive

• meeting

• held

• at

• ICANN59

• -

• those

• not

• able

• to

• participate

• are

• encouraged

• to

• review

• the

• transcript

• and

• recording.

• Everyone

• is

• encouraged

• to

• participate

• in

• surveys

• and

• other

• requests

• for

• input

• as

• it

• will

• be

• imperative

• to

• be

• able

• to

• meet

• the

• timeline

• as

• set

• out

• in

• the

• work

• plan

3.           

Review

of

survey

results

charter

question

#4

(please

complete

the

survey

at

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/charterquestion4[surveymonkey.com])

  *  

• To

• date,

• 15

• responses

• have

• been

• received.

• Currently

• views

• on

• question

• #1

• re.

• timeframe

• for

• allocation

• of

• funds

• are

• equally

• split

• between

• one-off

• exercise

• and

• long

• lasting

• mechanism

• through

• possible

• investment.

• What

• return

• on

• investment

• could

• be

• obtained

• -

• that

• may

• determine

• what

• timeframe

• you

• would

• be

• looking

• at?

• How

• much

• money

• per

• year,

• if

• the

• CCWG

• would

• want

• to

• pursue

• this

• approach?

• This

• could

• be

• a

• potential

• question

• for

• external

• experts?

• Board

• may

• also

• have

• input

• on

• this

• question

• based

• on

• experience

• to

• date.

• Funds

• are

• currently

• invested

• with

• a

• view

• of

• preservation

• so

• return

• is

• currently

• pretty

• small

• as

• investments

• are

• low

• risk.

• In

• relation

• to

• the

• duration

• of

• projects

• to

• be

• supported,

• current

• responses

• indicate

• that

• there

• is

• no

• specific

• preference

• for

• short

• time

• or

• long

• term

• projects.

• Will

• at

• some

• point

• also

• need

• to

• consider

• cost

• of

• overhead

• of

• short

• term

• vs.

• long

• term

• projects.

• Should

• provide

• some

• further

• info

• on

• what

• is

• considered

• short

• term

• vs.

• long

• term.

• Short

• term

• could

• be

• 1

• year

• or

• less,

• medium

• term

• up

• to

• 3

• years,

• long

• term

• 5

• years

• and

• up.

• Note

• that

• the

• different

• questions

• are

• interlinked.

• How

• money

• is

• allocated

• is

• linked

• to

• the

• magnitude

• of

• projects

• funded,

• duration,

• etc.

• Decisions

• on

• one

• will

• likely

• impact

• others.

• Please

• consider

• that

• CCWG

• does

• not

• have

• to

• select

• one

• single

• mechanism.

• There

• can

• be

• one

• for

• short

• term

• /

• smaller

• amounts

• and

• other

• for

• long

• term

• /

• large

• disbursements.

• Leadership

• team

• to

• review

• results

• and

• consider

• how

• to

• move

• forward

• if

• there

• is

• no

• clear

• preference

• on

• some

• of

• these

• questions.

Action

item

#1:

Staff

to

reach

out

Xavier

to

obtain

further

input

regarding

current

investment

and

return.

Action

item

#2:

CCWG

members

and

participants

that

have

not

responded

to

the

survey

yet

are

encouraged

to

complete

the

survey

for

charter

question

#4

by

20

July.

4.           

Review

of

survey

results

charter

question

#7

(please

complete

the

survey

at

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/charterquestion7[surveymonkey.com])

  *  

• Difficult

• to

• answer

• without

• some

• further

• details

• -

• what

• would

• it

• entail

• for

• ICANN

• to

• do

• this?

• Would

• it

• be

• a

• question

• of

• 3

• people

• or

• 20?

• Those

• details

• may

• determine

• whether

• it

• would

• be

• feasible

• and/or

• desirable

• to

• have

• ICANN

• manage

• this.

• May

• also

• be

• a

• question

• for

• external

• experts

• although

• some

• specificity

• would

• need

• to

• be

• provided

• to

• be

• able

• to

• provide

• a

• response.

• One

• off

• -

• within

• ICANN,

• longer

• term

• -

• external

• to

• ICANN?

• May

• be

• dependent

• on

• the

• answer

• to

• that

• question.

• Setting

• up

• a

• foundation

• was

• not

• excluded

• when

• reviewing

• the

• AGB.

• With

• regards

• to

• community

• volunteer

• involvement,

• need

• to

• consider

• not

• creating

• additional

• bureaucracy,

• costs

• as

• well

• as

• factor

• in

• possible

• conflicts

• of

• interest.

Action

item

#3:

CCWG

members

and

participants

that

have

not

responded

to

the

survey

yet

are

encouraged

to

complete

the

survey

for

charter

question

#7

by

20

July.

5.           

Review

feedback

received

on

charter

question

#2

survey

&

next

steps

(see

attached

documents)

• No

• further

• feedback

• received

• on

• the

• mailing

• list.

• A

• number

• of

• updates

• made

• based

• on

• discussions

• during

• ICANN59

• as

• well

• as

• one

• additional

• response

• received.

• CCWG

• to

• determine

• how

• to

• move

• from

• this

• list

• to

• preliminary

• agreement

• on

• what

• the

• (preliminary)

• agreed

• objective

• for

• fund

• allocation

• should

• be.

• Criteria

• must

• be

• implementable

• and

• consistent

• with

• ICANN's

• mission.

• Consider

• a

• possible

• check-list

• to

• see

• which

• of

• the

• criteria

• are

• most

• consistent

• with

• ICANN's

• mission.

• Objectives

• and

• criteria

• are

• quite

• different.

• criteria

• refers

• normally

• (with

• grants

• management)

• to

• eligibility,

• forms

• to

• fill,

• licensing,

• use,

• copyright,

• etc.

• that

• is

• a

• very

• practical

• and

• operational.

• Objectives

• are

• very

• important

• as

• that

• help

• applicants

• to

• decide

• if

• they

• want

• to

• apply

• or

• not.

• SDGs

• is

• a

• good

• framework

• to

• consider.

• To

• broaden

• the

• desired

• impact

• without

• broadening

• the

• mission

• (as

• ICANN's

• mission

• is

• narrow

• and

• might

• change

• again

• in

• the

• future).

• Need

• to

• ask

• not

• only

• whether

• something

• is

• within

• ICANN"s

• mission,

• but

• also

• rationale.

• Following

• determination

• /

• agreement

• on

• overall

• objective(s),

• CCWG

• could

• go

• back

• to

• concrete

• examples

• and

• stress

• test

• those

• against

• the

• mission.

Action

item

#4:

Staff

to

work

with

leadership

team

to

develop

survey

that

would

assess

support

for

different

objectives

as

well

as

assessment

of

whether

it

falls

within

ICANN's

mission

and

why.

Share

survey

for

preview

with

CCWG

prior

to

launch.

6.           

Questions

for

external

experts

–

reminder

(see

https://docs.google.com/document/d/152k_W8Wkp7XecejOutuYbCwAITwgfU3uHyzZEVgznjA/edit)[docs.google.com]

• CCWG

• may

• need

• to

• identify

• at

• which

• stage

• of

• the

• process

• external

• input

• will

• be

• most

• helpful.

• May

• require

• further

• details

• on

• scope/objective

• for

• it

• to

• be

• a

• helpful

• conversation.

• Maybe

• focus

• first

• on

• scope/objective

• related

• questions

• to

• help

• inform

• the

• current

• stage

• of

• deliberations.

• May

• need

• one-pager

• to

• explain

• status

• of

• work

• so

• external

• experts

• have

• an

• understanding

• of

• the

• work

• of

• the

• CCWG,

• especially

• with

• regards

• to

• scope.

• That

• may

• also

• help

• identify

• umbrella

• questions.

Action

item

#4:

CCWG

encouraged

to

add

questions

for

external

experts

to

the

google

doc

at

https://docs.google.com/document/d/152k_W8Wkp7XecejOutuYbCwAITwgfU3uHyzZEVgznjA/edit[docs.google.com]   

7.           

Confirm

next

steps

&

next

meeting

(Thursday

27

July

at

14.00

UTC)