Page History

...

for other places see: http://tinyurl.com/zo2z9hj 

PROPOSED AGENDA: 

1.            Welcome/Review Agenda

...

On audio only: 

Notes/Actions:

1.  Working Group Meeting Schedule

Discussion Notes:

• Avoid 1900 UTC (not currently a scheduled time).
• 3 time slots are: 0300, 1500, and 2000 UTC.  See the Google Doc at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QLmUjQZB7x2ez74td4m5GC1q1pHeO5ke2ePpiy3gdG8/edit#gid=0.
• Put out a fortnightly or longer term schedule.

2.  Board Letter to GNSO Council on New gTLDs

Discussion Notes:

• Sent a letter to the PDP WG Liaison, Paul McGrady, to request that the GNSO Council should consult with this PDP WG before responding.
• Wait for the GNSO Council discussion on 01 September and deal with questions that they pass on to the PDP WG.

3.  Work Track Sub Team Status Updates

Discussion Notes:

• Work Track Sub Teams 1 and 2 held initial meetings and selected Co-Leaders:
  • Work Track 1 Sub Team: Sara Bockey and Christa Taylor
  • Work Track 2 Sub Team: Phil Buckingham and Michael Flemming
  • PDP WG Co-Chairs and Sub Team Co-Leaders will meet to discuss the Work Plans.
  • Sub Team 4 meets at 2000 UTC on 25 August and Sub Team 3 meets at 1500 UTC on 30 August.
  • Need Co-Leader volunteers/nominations for Sub Teams 3 and 4
  • Sub Teams Co-Leaders will provide status updates at the PDP WG meetings

4. CC1 Review Tools (General Comments, Questions 1a and 1b)

Action Item:

Ask for clarification from the IPC representatives re: meaning of their response to Question 1a -- IPC response, "No.  However, we note that there has, in fact, been no ongoing mechanism for which the policy called."

Discussion Notes:

• The GNSO Council responded to the GAC advice -- update the tool.
• PDP WG should be involved in future Council responses to the next GAC Communique.
• Need to write comments on the initials responses.  Need PDP WG comments in order to respond.  The foundation of what will be written is in the tool.  Need to look at what has already been suggested.
• Produce a response to the GAC and other commenters, per the PDP.  Response should be broken down by question.