Page History
...
Members: Avri Doria, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Greg Shatan, Jonathan Robinson, Lise Fuhr, Maarten Simon, Olivier Crepin-Leblond, Seun Ojedeji, Paul Kane, Wanawit Ahkuputra (10)
Participants: Chuck Gomes, Jian Zhang, Jordan Carter, Kavouss Arasteh, Martin Boyle, Mary Uduma, Matthew Shears, Sabine Meyer, Young-eum Lee (9)
Legal Counsel: Rebecca Grapsas, Sharon Flanagan
Staff: Berry Cobb, Brenda Brewer, Yuko Green, Trang Nguyen, Samantha Eisner, Marika Konings
Apologies: Andrew Sullivan, Eduardo Diaz
**Please let Brenda know if your name has been left off the list (attendees or apologies).**
Agenda
- Status Update (Chairs)
- Implementation Update (Staff)
- Key Issues (with Sidley)
- PTI Articles of Incorporation
- PTI Governance Documents
- Conflict of Interest Policy
- Board Code of Conduct
- Expected Standard of Behavior
- PTI Bylaws (including Annex C)
- Naming Functions Agreement
- Services Agreement (headers now available)
- IANA IPR
- Client Committee
- AOB
Notes
:1. Status Update
· Grace Abuhamad is departing ICANN, Yuko Green to step in for CWG support
2. Implementation Update
· RZERC member qualification criteria has been agreed within IOTF e-mail list
ACTION (ICANN): Circulate the RZERC qualification to CWG mail list
· PTI documents review process and timeline have been shared by Trang Nguyen
· PTI documents are; Articles of Incorporation, Conflict of Interest Policy, Board Code of Conduct, Expected Standard
of Behavior, Bylaws, Naming Functions Agreement, Subcontracting Agreements, and Services Agreement.
· CWG's role in document review is to ensure that the implementation actions maintain the integrity of the CWG Proposal
3. Key Issues
· PTI Expected Standards of Behavior document was created as a direct response to NTIA's report
· Though PTI will not have ICANN style meetings, there will be unique points of interaction with PTI where PTI should
be clearly governed by the Expected Standards of Behavior document.
· Sidley has no major comments or controversial edits on either Conflict of Interest Policy or Code of Conduct documents.
ACTION (ICANN Legal): Review Sidley's comments on 3 governance documents and bring version 2 documents to CWG for review
Chairs note: ICANN / CWG will need to agree how version 2 documents are incorporated e.g. will they be submitted to the public comment forum on the 3 governance documents?
ACTION (CWG): Review the recirculated Annex C table before the next CWG meeting/s
Chairs note: Next meeting/s expected to review CWG public comment input on PTI Bylaws and discuss initial input from Sidley on PTI contracts (Naming Functions Agreement and Intercompany Agreement)
5. AOB
· DT-O met on 20 July and work is progressing. they will provide status update to CWG.
· DT-A's meeting will occur on 21 July at 2100 UTC and CWG is invited.
· CWG may require a meeting on Tuesday 26 July and confirmation of the timing for the Thursday 28 July meeting is also required. Chairs will give notice asap to CWG
ACTION (Chairs): Confirm next meeting/s date and time
Action Items
- ACTION (ICANN): Circulate the RZERC qualification to CWG mail list
- ACTION (ICANN Legal): Review Sidley's comments on 3 governance documents and bring version 2 documents to CWG for review
- ACTION (CWG): Review the recirculated Annex C table before the next CWG meeting/s
- ACTION (Chairs): Confirm next meeting/s date and time
Transcript
Recordings
- Adobe Connect recording is available here: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p4sbxry2wxi/
- MP3 recording is available here: http://audio.icann.org/stewardship-transition/cwg-iana-21jul16-en.mp3
Documents
- Agenda Item 1: Action Items from last meeting
- Agenda Item 2: PTI Document review process and timeline
- Agenda Item 3: Change-Pro Redline - Draft PTI Board of Directors' Code of Conduct - Dra....pdf
- Agenda Item 3: Change-Pro Redline - Draft PTI Conflicts of Interest Policy - Draft Post....pdf
- Agenda item 3: Change-Pro Redline - Draft PTI Expected Standards of Behavior - Draft Po....pdf
Chat Transcript
Brenda Brewer: (7/21/2016 00:37) Good day all and welcome to CWG IANA Meeting #84 on 21 July 2016 @ 06:00 UTC!
Lise Fuhr: (00:55) Hello all from a very warm Brussels
Kavouss Arasteh: (00:58) Hello to everybody
Chuck Gomes (RySG): (00:59) Hi
Jordan Carter (.nz): (00:59) hello all
Paul Kane: (01:00) Morning
martin boyle, Nominet: (01:01) Mornin'
Matthew Shears: (01:01) morning
Greg Shatan: (01:01) Night.
Yuko Green: (01:01) All, we will get started in about 2 minutes
Avri Doria: (01:01) for onece i am in morning on an middle of the night call.
Lise Fuhr: (01:02) @Greg it is all a matter of perspective
Lise Fuhr: (01:02) :-)
Jordan Carter (.nz): (01:02) is there any audio right now? If there is I have broken my headset and need to fix
Avri Doria: (01:02) i do not hear anything now, but did
Mary Uduma: (01:02) Good morning All from Nigeria
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (01:02) Hi all I will only be in AC today as I am on 2 calls and in 2 AC rooms at once
Avri Doria: (01:03) i hate having to do that
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (01:03) yup tell e about it!
Greg Shatan: (01:08) jcall just dropped
Greg Shatan: (01:09) I'm back.
Avri Doria: (01:09) NTIA absorbs another? congrat to them, and to her.
Matthew Shears: (01:09) yes, thanks so much Grace - you're a star
Jordan Carter (.nz): (01:09) Congrats Grace!
Jordan Carter (.nz): (01:09) a real loss for ICANN
Greg Shatan: (01:09) You get dropped from a call for one minute and the whole world goes to heck!
Paul Kane: (01:09) Agree - 100%. Outstanding contribution Grace. Thank you and good luck in your new role
Jordan Carter (.nz): (01:10) and a real gain for NTIA :-)
Greg Shatan: (01:10) Congratulations, Grace (not sure on what...)
Avri Doria: (01:10) and Welcome + good luck to Yuko.
martin boyle, Nominet: (01:10) Fully agreed. USG's win, ICANN's loss
Mary Uduma: (01:11) will miss Grace but Congratulations
Kavouss Arasteh: (01:11) Grace, we all missed you , your contributions, your endulgence, your patience and your high quality
Jordan Carter (.nz): (01:13) :)
Yuko Green: (01:14) @Avri, thank you!
Jordan Carter (.nz): (01:15) Go well Yuko
Yuko Green: (01:18) @Jordan, thank you!
Matthew Shears: (01:21) yes, congratz Yuko
Jordan Carter (.nz): (01:25) is a different way to say Paul's question: who owns the document? the CWG or ICANN staff?
Paul Kane: (01:25) Yes - that is what I am asking - Thanks jordan
Matthew Shears: (01:25) hopefully the CWG
Paul Kane: (01:25) What are we doing here... if ICANN review comments and then manke changes
Matthew Shears: (01:26) + 1 Lise
Kavouss Arasteh: (01:27) What is the life time of CWG?D
Jordan Carter (.nz): (01:27) I am just asking for clarity, that's all Lise - not asking for anything :-)
Mary Uduma: (01:27) +1Lise
Jordan Carter (.nz): (01:27) (other than clarity!)
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (01:27) Indeed Lise
Kavouss Arasteh: (01:27) PLS REPLY TO MY QUESTION
Jonathan Robinson: (01:27) Integrtity of the implementation is key.
Yuko Green: (01:27) everybody can scroll/zoom
Jordan Carter (.nz): (01:28) I'm sure if staff end up finalising things that aren't consistent with teh report, the CWG will say so, so in effect I think the group de facto owns the docs
Lise Fuhr: (01:28) @Kavouss when the implemtation is completed the CWG has no longer a purpose
Lise Fuhr: (01:29) Implementation
Paul Kane: (01:29) Jordan, I agree but I think that needs to be made clear as the info I hear is the we CWG have no control of the Integrity....
Jonathan Robinson: (01:29) ATrang. THese two new documents on Process and Work Plan are helpful illustrations of activity.
Chuck Gomes (RySG): (01:29) To ensure CWG recommendations are implemented as proposed and intended, the CWG or at least some subset of it should continue functioning until implementation is completed.
Matthew Shears: (01:29) agree Chuck
Matthew Shears: (01:29) possibly the IOTF
Paul Kane: (01:30) Agree Chuck - IOTF is being wound up
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (01:30) yes Chuck in the style of other Implementation Teams of recent times
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (01:31) I admit the IOTF does make sense
Jonathan Robinson: (01:33) We coudl readily reconvene the IOTF. We are currently not using the IOTF since there is a need for regular CWG meetings and the IOTF meetings would have been duplicative.
Greg Shatan: (01:35) ASO is an ICANN structure, so it (technically) would not be the ASO. It could be the NRO or the RIRs.
Greg Shatan: (01:37) As drafted. the parties to the Naming Functions Agreement are ICANN and PTI.
Avri Doria: (01:40) but Seun has a point CWG is the part of ICANN that represents the naming OC
Jonathan Robinson: (01:40) Seun makes a good point.
Jonathan Robinson: (01:40) Note also that the doucments are subject to public comment.
Kavouss Arasteh: (01:42) pLS CLEARLY DEFINE WHO IS OPERATION COMMUNITY DEALING WITH naming
Avri Doria: (01:43) That is the point, ICANn has done the Implementation, we have only been commenting. And the fact that there is a public comment is significant.
Kavouss Arasteh: (01:43) pls answer my question
Kavouss Arasteh: (01:44) Please clearly define who is the operational community dealing for naming
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (01:45) exactly Avri
Matthew Shears: (01:45) agree Avri
Avri Doria: (01:54) can it be changed to 'any scheduled meetings'
Paul Kane: (01:54) Agree Sharon
Paul Kane: (01:54) Many people do not attend ICANN
Samantha Eisner: (01:54) Attendance at meetings is a similar obligation to those, for exxample, who serve on the CWG to regularly attend teh meetings that they have been named as members in order to attend
Samantha Eisner: (01:55) Even in the ICANN realm, it's not just about attending ICANN's public meetings
Paul Kane: (01:55) I think there is a small confusion - it is not expected that customers of PTI attend meetings (ICANN)
Samantha Eisner: (01:55) We think that consensus items are important for the working groups that will be making key recommendations
Samantha Eisner: (01:56) @Paul, I fully agree with you - there is no expectation that customers of PTI are expected to attend either PTI or ICANN meetings
Paul Kane: (01:56) Thanks Sam
Samantha Eisner: (01:57) However, if there is a person who is named as a representative to a PTI-related group (CSC, etc), they'd be expected to attend those meetings
Paul Kane: (01:57) Agree
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (02:04) today for some of us Chuck ;-)
Jonathan Robinson: (02:05) What time is the SLE meeting?
Jonathan Robinson: (02:06) 21h00 UTC today
Trang Nguyen: (02:06) Thank you, Jonathan!
Jordan Carter (.nz): (02:06) thanks all
Matthew Shears: (02:06) bye
Maarten Simon: (02:06) bye
Trang Nguyen: (02:06) Thank you, All! Bye!
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (02:06) good call thanks
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): (02:06) bye\
Avri Doria: (02:07) bye
martin boyle, Nominet: (02:07) thanks & bye
Yuko Green: (02:07) Thank you all