Versions Compared

Old Version 12

changes.mady.by.user Ariel Liang

Saved on

compared with

New Version 13

changes.mady.by.user Ariel Liang

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
 No.RecommendationRecipientThematic Group SourceAssigneesStatus
 7A periodic review of ICANN's MSM should be performed to ensure that the processes and the composition of ICANN’s constituent parts adequately address the relevant decision-making requirements in the CorporationICANN BoardTG1
  • IANA Transition & ICANN Accountability

Status
colourYellow
titleIn Progress

 

...

Action: 

  • : Ariel Liang to send this recommendation to the ALAC mailing list for review. 

 

...

Notes: 

  • Could feed into ICANN accountability process and the work of At-Large IANA issues WG.
  • : 
    • CCWG-Accountability doesn't seem to work on the specifics as mentioned in the recommendations; 
    • In Work Stream 2, the CCWG will discuss how the rest of the community should be accountable to each other and the rest of the Board. Hence, this recommendation may be addressed after the IANA transition. 
  • : 
    • Seems to be a fair assessment re previous notes. 
  • : 
    • WS2 will address the accountability issue for all parts of ICANN. This recommendation doesn't concern that issue. 
    • Tijani Ben Jemaa: This rec recommendation speaks about the decision-making process in ICANN and the distribution of power? 
    • Olivier Crepin-Leblond: This rec recommendation talks about the review of all components of ICANN (e.g. the role roles and structures of SOs/ACs). The organizational reviews address this. The only Another path of dressing this would be the CCWG-Accountability WS2? 
    • Tijani Ben Jemaa / Sebastien Bachollet: This rec recommendation is not really within the scope of the CCWG-Accountability. CCWG-Accountability WS2 will play a small part in organizational reviews, but not sufficienttouch on the roles and structures of SOs/ACs, but its work is not all about organizational reviews. Maybe ATRT or other processes will address the global review of ICANN in a more systematic manner. 
    • R3 White Paper of the Future Challenges WG (re. restructuring ICANN) may be relevant to this recommendation. But the The ALAC needs to sure what we wantunderstand what exactly it wants out of this recommendation. 
    • This recommendation is related to ATLAS II Recommendation 13.