Page History
| No. | Recommendation | Recipient | Thematic Group Source | Assignees | Status | ||||||||
| 7 | A periodic review of ICANN's MSM should be performed to ensure that the processes and the composition of ICANN’s constituent parts adequately address the relevant decision-making requirements in the Corporation | ICANN Board | TG1 |
|
|
...
Notes:
- Could feed into ICANN accountability process and the work of At-Large IANA issues WG.
- :
- CCWG-Accountability doesn't seem to work on the specifics as mentioned in the recommendations;
- In Work Stream 2, the CCWG will discuss how the rest of the community should be accountable to each other and the rest of the Board. Hence, this recommendation may be addressed after the IANA transition.
- :
- Seems to be a fair assessment re previous notes.
- :
- WS2 will address the accountability issue for all parts of ICANN. This recommendation doesn't concern that issue.
- Tijani Ben Jemaa: This rec speaks about the decision-making process and the distribution of power?
- Olivier Crepin-Leblond: This rec talks about the review of all components of ICANN (e.g. the role and structures of SOs/ACs). The organizational reviews address this. The only path of dressing this would be the CCWG-Accountability WS2?
- Tijani Ben Jemaa / Sebastien Bachollet: This rec is not really within the scope of the CCWG-Accountability. CCWG-Accountability WS2 will play a small part in organizational reviews, but not sufficient. Maybe ATRT or other processes will address the global review of ICANN in a more systematic manner.
- R3 White Paper of the Future Challenges WG (re. restructuring ICANN) may be relevant to this recommendation. But the ALAC needs to sure what we want.
