Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

-       Summary of ICANN’s assessment of implementation including actions taken, implementability and effectiveness

[This section may include the following elements:  Board approval of previous review teams’ recommendations and directive to staff; staff/Board/relevant SO/AC implementers’ input via written and oral reports.]

The ATRT 2 inquired as to how the benchmarking was done and whether it was published, specific to the benchmarking portion of this recommendation.

Relative to benchmarking Board/BGC skillsets, the Board Skill and Training Benchmarking Analysis was published in October 2012 (http://www.icann.org/en/news/in-focus/accountability/board-benchmarking-analysis-14oct12-en.pdf).  Grant Thornton’s National Board Governance Survey for Not-for-Profit Organizations is cited in this analysis and was one of the key sources used for benchmarking.   The information generated from the surveys and materials reviewed in the benchmarking analysis were received from 465 CEOs, CFOs, board members and other officials of higher education institutions, trade and professional associations, social and human service organizations, cultural organizations, health care organizations and foundations.  

Much has been done to inform the community about NomCom and contribute to transparency - web site improvements as well as presentations and other communications to keep people informed.  Additional and innovative outreach/PR efforts focused on finding candidates would be useful.  Staff is already considering the following tactics - integrating messaging about recruitment effort into all presentations, coordinating with GSE regional leaders and expanding social media activities. 

-       Summary of community input on implementation, including effectiveness

...