Page History
These templates are a tool to organize thinking and provide basis for informed debate
...
. The templates are not intended to be a report format.
The template is organized in two sections:
A. Analysis of previous review teams recommendations - Section A. should be completed for each recommendation made by the prior review teams. It is intended to document assessment of ATRT 2 of ICANN’s implementation of prior recommendations.
B. Proposed new recommendations - Section B. should be completed for new recommendations.
Please use the following blank template Template - Revised 17 Aug 2013
...
Issue | Review Team Member |
---|---|
GAC participation in policy processes (WS1.b) | Lawrence Strickling |
Publication of yearly statistical reports on transparency (whistle blower) (WS4) | Avri Doria |
Cross-constituency work | Alan Greenberg, Avri Doria |
Reconsideration (WS1.a) | Carlos Gutierrez |
Public comment process (WS1.c) | Brian Cute |
PDP (WS1.e) | Alan Greenberg |
Communications for the Board (WS1.a) | David Conrad |
Communications for the GAC (WS1.b) | Stephen Conroy |
Review process (WS4) | Brian Cute, David Conrad |
Multilingual Quality (WS4) | Lise Lise Fuhr, Fiona Asonga |
Draft templates submitted For DC meeting
Number | Stream | Topic | Token holderDoc | Template | Staff Responses | ATRT2 Member Comments | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | WS 1 (9.1 a) | Mechanisms for identifying collective Board skillset; benchmarking Board/BGC skillsets; tailoring & consulting on skills; reviewing for each NomCom; publishing outcomes & requirements with NomCom’s notice. | Avri / Brian | draft | under development | ||
2 | WS 1 (9.1 a) | Regularly reinforce/review training & skills building. | Avri / Brian | ||||
3 | WS 1 (9.1 a) | Increase transparency of NomCom’s deliberations & decision-making process. ASAP but starting no later than next NomCom. | Avri / Brian | ||||
4 | WS 1 (9.1 a) | Continue to enhance Board performance & work practices. | Brian / Avri | ||||
5 | WS 1 (9.1 a) | Implement Implement compensation scheme for voting Board Directors. | Brian / Avri | ||||
6 | WS 1 (9.1 a) | Clarify Clarify distinction between PDP & executive function issues. | Brian / Avri | ||||
7 | WS 1 (9.1 a) | Promptly publish all appropriate Board materials related to decision-making processes. | Avri / Brian | ||||
8 | WS 1 (9.1 a) | Publish rationale for Board decisions and for accepting or rejecting public & community input. | Avri / Brian | ||||
9 | WS 1 (9.1 a) | Publish redaction conditions. | Brian / Avri | ||||
10 | WS 1 (9.1 a) | Publish translated Board material within 21 days | Brian / Avri | ||||
11 | WS 4 | Multilingual quality and timeliness | |||||
12 | WS 1 (9.1 a) | Ensure/certify that inputs in policymaking processes are considered by the Board | Avri / Brian | ||||
13 | WS 1 (9.1 a) | Get input from committee of independent experts on restructuring review mechanisms | |||||
14 | WS 1 (9.1 a) | Clarify standard for Reconsideration requests | |||||
15 | WS 1 (9.1 a) | Assess Ombudsman relationship and confirm framework is consistent with international standards | Carlos / Avri | ||||
16 | WS 1 (9.1 a) | Adopt Adopt standard timeline & format for Reconsideration Requests | Brian / Avri | ||||
17 | WS 1 (9.1 b) | Clarify what constitutes GAC public policy “advice” under the Bylaws. | |||||
18 | WS 1 (9.1 b) | Create Create formal, documented process for requesting, tracking GAC advice. | |||||
19 | WS 1 (9.1 b) | Ensure timely provision & consideration of GAC advice and mechanisms for Board follow-up | |||||
20 | WS 1 (9.1 b) | Board, acting through the JWG, should develop & implement a process to engage the | |||||
21 | WS 1 (9.1 b) | Increase support & commitment of governments to the GAC process | |||||
22 | WS 1 (9.1 c) | Implement stratified, prioritized public Notice & Comment processes. | |||||
23 | WS 1 (9.1 c) | Provide “Comment” cycle & a “Reply Comment” comment cycles; review and adjust fixed timelines for Notice & Comment | |||||
24 | WS 1 (9.1 c) | Ensure Ensure multilingual access in PDP to maximum extent feasible | |||||
25 | WS 1 (9.1 c) | Create Create annual public comment forecast | |||||
26 | WS 1 (9.1 c) | Ensure senior staffing arrangements are appropriately multilingual | |||||
27 | WS 1 (9.1 d) | Evaluate and report on progress on recommendations and accountability & transparency commitments in the AoC. | Brian / Avri | ||||
28 | WS 1 (9.1 e) | Effectiveness of the GNSO PDP | Alan / Avri | ||||
29 | WS 1 (9.1 e) | Effectiveness of cross-community deliberations | Avri / Alan | draftv2 | |||
30 | WS 4 | Make improvements to the Review processes: Appointment of Review Teams | |||||
31 | WS 4 | Make improvements to the Review processes: Getting the Review Team started with a complete implementation report | |||||
32 | WS 4 | Make improvements to the Review processes: Review Budget Transparency and Accountability | |||||
33 | WS 4 | Make improvements to the Review processes: Incorporation of review teams input into ICANN strategic plan and Institutionalization of progress | |||||
34 | WS 4 | Review actions of the Board and staff in ensuring public interest: Finance Accountability and Transparency | |||||
35 | WS 4 | Review actions of the Board and staff in ensuring public interest: Publication of yearly statistical reports on transparency | Avri | Annual Transparency Auditdraftv3 | needs revision based on Staff comments | ||
36 | WS 4 | Review actions of the Board and staff in ensuring public interest: Employee Hotline (Whistleblower Policy) | Avri | ||||
37 | WS 4 | Review actions of the Board and staff in ensuring public interest: Volunteer engagement | |||||
38 | WS 2 | Board handling of SSR RT recommendations | |||||
39 | WS 2 | Assessment of implementation of SSR RT recommendations | |||||
40 | WS 3 | Board handling of WHOIS RT recommendations | |||||
41 | WS 3 | Assessment of implementation of WHOIS RT recommendations | |||||
42 | WS 4 | Outreach | Included in GAC-related recommendations |
...