Page History
...
The closing date for the survey was extended until 14 January 2012, because the reply was not sufficient at this time. Filiz Yilmaz from ICANN Staff and main contact point for this WG informed the WG that she is leaving ICANN by the end of the year. As new contact point form ICANN Staff Denise Michele was introduced.
...
The discussion during this meeting was very productive and cooperative, most stakeholder groups where represented. It has been agreed to make an assessment on the development needs for individual participants in the SOs, ACs, SGs and constituencies. A drafting team volunteered to develop a survey to be sent out to applicable ICANN groups. It will include included questions which will build a foundation for the future effort of this working group. The first draft of the survey was discussed and modified during the second informal meeting on Friday 19 October 2012 and is attached to this email.
Once After the survey is was evaluated by the WG, it will be was sent to ICANN Communications for a quick review and comments and then sent to the applicable leaders. We will give them around 1 month to reply to this survey. As such, we should have the results by the end of November.
The following community members have volunteered with drafting the initial version of the Survey.
- Chuck Gomes
- Ron Sherwood
- Yaovi Atohoun
- Hong Xue
- YJ Park
- Sandra Hoferichter
...
The discussion form the Prague meeting was continued on the mailing list and lead to some first concrete proposals how the pilot in Toronto should be organised, what should be included in the curriculum.
...
...
June 2012
A first introductorycall of the expanded WG took place on 1 June 2012. It was a briefing call and to define tasks and operations of the Expanded Academy WG. The call was well attended by representatives of all stakeholder groups within ICANN. Many questions where raised by participants to get a clear understanding of the project and it’s impact for every constituency. A lot of the discussion was concerning the budget and finances. (see: At-Large ICANN Academy Expanded WG 01-06-2012)
...
The meeting was well attended, but the discussion tuned out only about responsibilities for of ICANN staff, the collaboration with the community and the use of the budget. The situation after this meeting was confused on both sides and a lot of discussion on the mailing list took place afterwards.
...
