Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • It does not satisfy the request for which the review was initiated;
  • It removes countries from their original regions to which they belong, to a different region, far from their lands, with very different language and culture, and a far different level of Internet penetration (Example: Yemen from Asia to Europe).
  • The document makes use of the term “mother countries”, a term that can be seen as offensive by some countries and appear to support colonialist ideals.
  • By proposing a new geographical region framework along specific lines, in this case, moving to the RIR model, ICANN would be taking full responsibility over Geographical Region Divide. This would open ICANN to taking the responsibility of deciding matters of sovereignty, international law & diplomacy, including taking sides in unresolved conflicts such as the one between Argentina and the United Kingdom about the Islas Malvinas “Falkland Islands” (See Appendix A)  

The draft final report says asserts that the current framework has created a large number of anomalies without detailing or even mentioning them. We believe that the proposed framework would create more problems at the representation level, as well as at the political level and will take responsibility for these anomalies. It will not fulfill the main requirement of diversity for which the geographic regions were created in ICANN.

...

While relations between Argentina and the UK were restored in 1989, the islands' sovereignty remains aside as a mutual understanding. As a result, comments received from the LACRALO region included the following:

For the sake of example, and making no judgment as to its pertinence or accuracy, we include an example of a comment, transcribed verbatim, received from a contributor living in the region covered by LACRALO. The level of diplomatic detail is such that other members from the region oppose this, and we hope this illustrates the complexity of a situation which ICANN should not pertain to have an answer to.

 

Item 50 . “the request should be initiated or supported by the local government of the relevant country or territory.”

...