Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Tip
titlePARTICIPATION

Attendance  

Apologies: Flip Petillion, Christopher Wilkinson, Jaap Akkerhuis, Luca Barbero

 

Note

Notes/ Action Items


Actions:

Draft recommendations and rationale for recommendations:

-- The leadership team has carefully considered the discussions that have taken place during Work Track 5 meetings, as well as mailing list contributions and the straw poll conducted earlier this month.

-- Drawing on these materials, the leadership team has prepared a set of draft recommendations. 

-- The co-leaders believe that these recommendations are ultimately a final product that the Work Track can accept. The co-leaders do not believe that there is sufficient support within the Work Track for additional recommendations that go beyond what is drafted. 

Any feedback on these items should be sent to the mailing list no later than Monday 30 September. At this stage, the co-leaders are not seeking additional substantive debate. Please only provide comments if you are unable to live with what is being presented.   (See the attached documents.)

 

Notes:

See the attached referenced slides and at: https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2019-09-25+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Procedures+PDP+Work+Track+5

Terms of Reference: https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/Terms+of+Reference

GNSO Working Group Guidelines: https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-18jun18-en.pdf 
See section 3.6 on page 8


-- Using Consensus Calls in the full WG – whether we have consensus or not.  Helpful if you can use a consensus call in WT5.

-- In terms of the comments from the WT5 you aren’t looking for us to write any of the sections?  Just comments on the document as is?

-- We are asking for comments by 30 September on the recommendations and rationale.

-- Feedback on the full Report is due 14 October.