Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Tip
titlePARTICIPATION

Attendance & chat

Apologies: Michael Graham, Zak Muscovitch


Note

Notes/ Action Items


Action Items:

  1. Sub Team members will review discussion threads on:
    1. Q1 (including Proposals #5 & #6): https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-trademark/2019-April/000324.html
    2. Q2 (including Proposals #1 & #12): https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-trademark/2019-April/000318.html
    3. Q3: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-trademark/2019-April/000325.html
    4. Q4: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-trademark/2019-May/000331.html
  2. Question 1, Proposal 6: Staff is checking with ICANN Org.
  3. Staff will update the summary table based on the transcript/recording from the meeting.

Brief Notes:

  1. Updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs): No updates provided.
  2. Development of Preliminary Recommendations: Continue discussing agreed Trademark Claims Charter Question 4

-- If we can get the notice right it could help potential registrants in flagging when there could be an issue, bringing to their awareness the possibility that there could be an issue.

-- Probably goes too far to expand to all non-exact matches, but could expand to match-plus, but not so widely to capture scenarios that are clearly non-infringing.

-- 4(a) -- Do we have any evidence of harm?  Doesn’t seem to be.

-- Could identify some limited non-exact matches that could be added.  There also is Michael Graham’s proposal.